Embedding human rights into a company’s management systems means making human rights an integral part of the company’s business culture and day-to-day operations, similar to other core business priorities such as efficiency, quality, cost, and environmental sustainability.
A company’s commitment to respect human rights should start with a public statement of policy explaining how the company understands its responsibilities.
The policy should set clear performance expectations (standards) for those who are expected to adhere to or implement it, such as the company’s own workforce, its suppliers, and other business partners. Scope of the human rights policy should ultimately reach all the way to the first mile of agricultural supply chains.
A formal supplier code of conduct is often used to convey expectations to Tier 1 suppliers, but standards should be cascaded by those suppliers to lower tiers as well. Policies for specific human rights issues such as child labor or forced labor, or for specific commodities or sectors, may also be useful tools for articulating priorities and driving progress.
The company has a policy that includes commitments to respect human rights and comply with international labor standards and local laws, and it has communicated the policy to its suppliers through a code of conduct.
In addition to “Basic,” the company fully aligns its existing human rights policy and code of conduct with customer and industry good practices, and it adds an explicit commitment to doing human rights due diligence (HRDD).
In addition to “Established,” the company works with suppliers to ensure they understand how to implement requirements in practice, and it engages stakeholders in the policy updating process.
Companies should establish governance and oversight processes for human rights performance similar to those used for other core business strategies to ensure policies are upheld in practice.
Senior leadership should assume formal accountability for human rights performance to ensure human rights are prioritized and embedded within corporate culture.
Executive managers should send clear messages about the company’s human rights commitments to staff across the organization and empower procurement staff and others to convey expectations to suppliers whose practices affect human rights. Executive performance should be evaluated and compensated partly based on the company’s human rights performance, following the principle that “what gets measured gets done.”
The company has assigned accountability for human rights performance to a senior executive and/or the Board of Directors.
In addition to “Basic,” review of the company’s human rights performance is a routine activity for executive leadership and the Board. Responsible managers and relevant functional staff are evaluated on their performance in implementing the human rights policy
In addition to “Established,” the company makes human rights performance an integral part of its executive and Board compensation schemes, and it ensures that other elements of executive compensation, such as total shareholder return, do not incentivize decisions that compromise human rights.
The way a company procures products and services should support—not hinder—a supplier’s ability to meet human rights requirements.
Once a company has stated its policy commitments to human rights, it should begin to align its procurement practices with those commitments. This means:
Rewards and recognition for procurement staff should not incentivize behaviors that could undermine suppliers’ ability to respect human rights.
The company has human rights requirements that are clearly and consistently communicated to suppliers in contracts and purchase agreements, and procurement staff understand the requirements and know how to apply them.
In addition to “Basic,” the company is actively addressing existing procurement practices that disincentivize human rights performance. The company’s procurement function has systematically integrated supplier human rights performance into its decision-making.
In addition to “Established,” the company routinely evaluates the impact of its procurement practices on the human rights performance of its suppliers, including first-mile farmers. It uses that information to improve its procurement practices and supplier incentives and to measure the performance of its procurement staff.
Companies should establish a dedicated team to carry out day-to-day human rights due diligence work, in addition to maintaining executive- and board-level accountability.
Human rights due diligence staff typically work within legal or sustainability departments, though they may also operate from procurement or other business units. Companies sourcing significant volumes of key commodities from specific countries should place human rights personnel within those regional or country teams.
Human rights teams must be sufficiently staffed and trained, with the necessary resources to support the company’s human rights objectives. Companies may need to invest in data systems to effectively support human rights due diligence oversight.
The company has a human rights team in place with clear roles and responsibilities. The team is developing information systems to record and track HRDD-related data, and it is connecting with other business units about HRDD implementation.
In addition to “Basic,” the company continues to build the capability of its human rights team and relevant business units to support HRDD implementation, including data systems.
In addition to “Established,” the company has committed to maintaining a human rights team that can manage its HRDD system indefinitely, including in key sourcing countries. The company’s HRDD information systems are fully functioning and can provide actionable data on human rights performance.