Help Wanted

Back to verite.org Menu

2. For suppliers

Guidance for suppliers on preventing forced labor and exploitation in recruitment and hiring.

Outlines CSR strategies, labor broker oversight, and Verité’s Systems Approach to Social Responsibility to protect migrant workers and ensure fair employment practices.

A framework for action:What can suppliers do?

Like their clients – the global brands for which they manufacture goods or provide services – suppliers are in a strong position to take effective action against abuse at the recruitment and hiring stages of the employment relationship.

They, too, can develop wide-ranging CSR programs establishing codes, self-assessment protocols, corrective action plans and partnership agreements that seek to address this abuse. They can also use their own human resource management systems to ensure the elimination of coercive practices that place migrant workers at risk.

Taking these steps will not only protect suppliers from compliance violations at their facilities, but it will also help migrant workers to begin their employment “on the right foot”. Setting the right tone in recruitment and hiring will pay dividends at the workplace, helping to ensure that you have a workforce that is happy, healthy and dedicated to working at your company.

Many suppliers are already implementing a social responsibility program aimed at meeting social and labor standards set by their customers, or as part of an industry initiative (e.g., the FLA, the ETI or the EICC), and may have policies, processes and practices in place to screen out and manage the risk of forced labor issues in their own workplaces. However, the risks of forced labor, debt bondage and trafficking, take on a different dynamic when companies hire migrant workers. The risks escalate further when migrant workers are hired through local or foreign labor brokers. Even for suppliers with existing social responsibility programs, the use of labor brokers means that existing programs may need a boost.

If suppliers hire domestic or foreign contract workers through labor brokers, they also need to ensure that specialized knowledge, procedures and practices are incorporated into their organization’s management systems and operational processes. Doing so will help meet their business needs, without sacrificing the rights of their employees or exposing their company to liabilities. Verité’s Systems Approach to Social Responsibility – represented by the tools offered in this Fair Hiring Toolkit and in Verité trainings offers a framework for action.

Organizational process and task levels

1. Organizational level: Intent

1. Organizational/management systems level: Intent

First, review your company’s written policies. Do they include a policy prohibiting forced labor? Do they also prohibit debt bondage and trafficking? Do they apply to all levels of operation and labor, manufacturing and materials supply chains? Do they apply to all geographic areas where your company has operations?

If your company already has a written policy commitment addressing forced labor, you may just need to strengthen the policy language to include specific prohibitions on debt bondage and trafficking. If these prohibitions are already included, you may also need to extend your commitment to fair, legal and humane treatment to migrant workers. While protections of migrant workers may already be indirectly reflected in nondiscrimination, wage, benefits, or labor-relations or other policies, if your company employs a large number of migrant workers, it is important to have this commitment at the heart of company policy.

Step 1 of the Fair Hiring toolkit for suppliers offers practical guidance and good practice examples of how suppliers can strengthen existing codes or develop new ones to effectively address forced labor and trafficking of migrant workers.

2. Operational level: Implementation

2. Operational/management systems level: Implementation

Once policies are in place, you can establish clear implementation procedures.

You may already have clear and well-communicated procedures for selection, recruitment and hiring workers under your Human Resource Management Department, but these procedures may only reflect the process for hiring local workers, or for hiring directly (without labor brokers). If that’s the case — and your company hires migrant workers or outsources the hiring of migrant workers to a labor broker – company procedures will likely need updating to address the related risk.

There are two primary ways to update existing hiring procedures to address the risks of hiring migrant workers:

  1. Review and strengthen existing hiring processes and add controls to address risks where necessary; or
  2. Develop a parallel hiring procedure that is triggered when migrant worker is hired or a labor broker is used.

If your company hires migrants migrant workers — even if the company does not use labor-brokers as on-site managers — company procedures for recruiting, hiring, and on-site management should take into account:

  • The additional legal requirements for hiring migrants. In addition to your local labor laws, you also need to consider the immigration laws of the sending and receiving countries, as well as the worker’s country of origin (if different from the sending country.) Where there are conflicts among these various regulations, your procedures should harmonize them such that you meet all regulations and still adhere to your overarching commitment to avoid forced labor, debt bondage, and trafficking.
  • The higher-order requirements (to address social responsibility risks) set by your industry or by your customers for hiring foreign workers. Again, where higher-order requirements conflict with legal requirements, your procedures should harmonize them. A clear example of such a conflict is when immigration requirements hold employers accountable for ensuring that foreign workers do not stay in the host country beyond certain time limits. This policy incentivizes employers to hold workers’ passports and other documents, as a way of protecting the company from the risk of workers “running away” from the facility and then overstaying their visas elsewhere in the country.

If your company currently uses, or is likely to use a labor broker in the future, your company should have procedural guidelines in place for:

  • Screening and Evaluating Labor Brokers – Screening brokers up front, before you officially engage them, will ensure that your company’s business needs are met. By screening brokers up front, your company can ensure that it works with labor brokers who can provide workers with necessary skills on time, and that those workers will be treated legally, fairly and humanely.

Your company can update procurement systems for screening your manufacturing or raw materials suppliers, to reflect the different output and performance objectives that you require of labor brokers.

Step 3 of the Fair Hiring toolkit for suppliers offers sample questions and a rating system to assist companies in designing a screening process for labor broker candidates, and deciding which labor broker to hire. It also details some key areas of concern in the screening process.

  • Managing Labor Brokers and Monitoring for Ethical Recruitment and Hiring – Once your company has engaged a labor broker, you will need a procedure that provides visibility into how your labor broker performs and meets its ethical and business obligations. Having a monitoring system in place gives you an objective basis for management decisions and incentivizes labor brokers to improve their performance.

Step 4 of the Fair Hiring toolkit for suppliers offers proactive management strategies that companies can employ to best ensure that legal and social compliance requirements are met by their labor brokers. It also offers guidance on key issues to consider during a labor broker performance assessment, and concrete sets of questions that can be adapted by companies in monitoring and evaluating broker performance.

3. Task level: People

3. Task level: People

Once procedures are established, you will want to ensure that each person in the company involved in these procedures has the knowledge, skills, tools, incentives and motivation to perform their tasks effectively.

Even when policies and procedures are robust, there may still be problems meeting objectives if the responsible staff members do not have adequate training or information. Capacity building is a first step. Controls, in the form of management and operations-level support for each individual in the process, need to be identified and put in place.

Step 2 of the Fair Hiring toolkit for suppliers provides some basic information that you can translate into training and communication materials for different levels of employees within your organization and supply chain.

2.1 Improving codes of conduct and company policies

Overview

Guidance for suppliers on strengthening codes of conduct to prevent forced labor, with tools for ethical recruitment, equality, and grievance procedures.

Explore this section

Introduction

Like brands, suppliers should have a code of conduct or high-level company policies that make a commitment to a fair and legal workplace and outline special protections for migrant workers.

Such policies will signal to all your stakeholders – including shareholders, employees, customers, and business and social partners – that you as a company are aware of the vulnerabilities that migrant workers can face to trafficking and forced labor, and that you are serious about ensuring the ethical treatment of migrant workers in your facilities.

These policies will help to guide and unify the actions and decisions of all who work for and with your company. They will help to ensure the development and implementation of sound operating procedures across all functional areas that screen out and manage risks and problems related to forced labor, debt bondage and trafficking.

Use the tools and links in the sidebar for practical guidance and good practice examples on how suppliers can strengthen existing codes or develop new ones to effectively address forced labor and trafficking of migrant workers.

These policies are just the first step. Suppliers should ensure that such high-level policies are supported by an institutional structure and written procedures for enforcement, monitoring and reporting. This can include:

  • Implementing systems and procedures for on-site management of migrant workers;
  • Screening of labor recruiter candidates against social responsibility requirements;
  • Managing and monitoring labor recruiters against this same set of requirements;
  • Ensuring that these principles are integrated in your own human resource management processes;
  • Establishing grievance mechanisms, procedures for investigation and reporting, and protection for whistleblowers; and
  • Ensuring the integration of feedback and continuous improvement in management systems and processes.

Explore the other sections of Verité’s Fair Hiring Toolkit to assist you in taking this 360º approach to the protection of migrant workers in your supply chains.

Tool 1: Sample code of conduct provisions

It is important that your corporate policy or code of conduct explicitly prohibits forced labor and human trafficking and sets out protections for migrant workers. Currently, most codes make only general reference to this kind of exploitation. The sample provisions below can be used by suppliers as they consider how best to create, strengthen or revise their own supply chain policies. These provisions address factors that are “enablers” or contributors to situations or risks of human trafficking and forced labor.

Forced or involuntary labor

Workers shall not be subject to any form of forced, compulsory, bonded, indentured, or prison labor. All work must be voluntary and workers shall have the freedom to terminate their employment at any time without penalty, given notice of reasonable length.

Recruitment fees

Workers shall not be charged any fees or costs for recruitment, directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, including costs associated with travel, processing official documents and work visas in both home and host countries.

Contracts of employment

Written contracts of employment shall be provided to migrant workers in a language they understand, clearly indicating their rights and responsibilities with regard to wages, working hours and other working and employment conditions. Migrant workers shall be provided with their employment contract prior to deployment. The use of supplemental agreements and the practice of contract substitution (the replacement of an original contract or any of its provisions with those that are less favorable) are strictly prohibited.

Document retention

Confiscating or withholding worker identity documents or other valuable items, including work permits and travel documentation (e.g. passports), is strictly prohibited. The retention of personal documents shall not be used as a means to bind workers to employment or to restrict their freedom of movement.

Deposits

Migrant workers shall not be required to lodge deposits or security payments at any time.

Humane treatment

The workplace shall be free of any form of harsh or inhumane treatment.

Disciplinary policies and procedures shall be clearly defined and communicated to all workers, and shall not include any inhumane disciplinary measure, including any corporal punishment, mental or physical coercion, or verbal abuse of workers; nor shall they include sanctions that result in wage deductions, reductions in benefits, or compulsory labor.

The use or threat of physical or sexual violence, harassment and intimidation against a worker, his or her family, or close associates, is strictly prohibited.

Workplace equality

All workers, irrespective of their nationality or legal status, shall be treated fairly and equally. Migrant workers shall benefit from conditions of work (including but not limited to wages, benefits, and accommodations) no less favorable than those available to country nationals. Migrant workers (or their family members) shall not be threatened with denunciation to authorities to coerce them into taking up or maintaining employment.

Wages and benefits

All workers shall be paid at least the minimum wage required by applicable laws, and shall be provided all legally mandated benefits. Wage payments shall be made at regular intervals and directly to workers, in accordance with national law, and shall not be delayed, deferred, or withheld. Only deductions, advances, and loans authorized by national law are permitted and, if made or provided, actions shall only be taken with the full consent and understanding of workers. Clear and transparent information shall be provided to workers about hours worked, rates of pay, and the calculation of legal deductions. All workers must retain full and complete control over their earnings. Wage deductions must not be used as a disciplinary measure, or to keep workers tied to the employer or to their jobs. Workers shall not be held in debt bondage or forced to work in order to pay off a debt. Deception in wage commitments, payment, advances, and loans is prohibited.

Working hours

Workers shall not be forced to work in excess of the number of hours permitted in national law. Where the law is silent, normal working hours shall not exceed eight per day and forty-eight per week, and total working hours including overtime shall not exceed sixty. All overtime shall be purely voluntary, unless part of a legally recognized collective bargaining agreement. No worker shall be made to work overtime under the threat of penalty, dismissal, or denunciation to authorities. No worker shall be made to work overtime as a disciplinary measure, or for failure to meet production quotas.

Freedom of movement and personal freedom

Workers’ freedom of movement shall not be unreasonably restricted. Workers shall not be physically confined to the workplace or related premises, such as employer- or recruiter-operated residences; nor shall any other coercive means be used to restrict workers’ freedom of movement or personal freedom. Mandatory residence in employer-operated facilities shall not be made a condition of employment.

Grievance procedures

An effective grievance procedure shall be established to ensure that any migrant worker, acting individually or with other workers, can submit a grievance without suffering any prejudice or retaliation of any kind.

Private employment agencies and labor recruiters

Companies should hire migrant workers directly whenever possible. When the subcontracting of recruitment and hiring is necessary, companies shall ensure that the labor agencies they engage operate legally, are certified or licensed by the competent authority, and do not engage in fraudulent behavior that places workers at risk of forced labor or trafficking for labor exploitation.

Tool 2: Sample benchmarks of good practice in recruitment and hiring

Benchmarks based on corporate policy that indicate good practice can help measure or evaluate the labor and human rights performance of suppliers and labor recruiters. The set of sample benchmarks below is consistent with the code provisions outlined in the previous tool and supports policy development covering labor recruiters as a key actor in global supply chains. These benchmarks can serve also as a basis for establishing and monitoring performance indicators.

Forced or involuntary labor
  • Company policies and practices express a clear prohibition of forced, compulsory, bonded, indentured, and prison labor that applies to all enterprises in its supply chain, including those involved in the recruitment, selection, and hiring or workers.
  • Clear and transparent human resource practices on recruitment, contracts, wages and working hours are adopted by the company and its subcontractors to minimize the risk of forced labor and human trafficking.
  • The company, or subcontractors acting on its behalf, comply with all relevant local laws and regulations concerning the prohibition of forced labor and human trafficking in each jurisdiction in which they operate.
  • The workplace is free of any form of forced, compulsory, bonded, indentured, or prison labor.
  • Workers enter into employment freely and employment terms and conditions are agreed to voluntarily, without deception or threat of penalty.
  • All work is voluntary.
  • Workers have the freedom to terminate their employment at any time without penalty, given notice of reasonable length.
Recruitment fees
  • The company has a written policy declaring that workers shall not pay any amount to secure a job in their facility.
  • The job advertisements from the company include the statement that no fees shall be charged at any phase in the recruitment and hiring process.
  • The employer covers all recruitment and processing fees, costs, and expenses, including those associated with securing identity cards, medical certificates and examinations, skills testing, and travel.
  • The company has mechanisms to ensure that workers are not charged any amount to secure a job in their facility.
  • The company only engages recruiters, agents, and sub-agents who do not charge fees to jobseekers.
  • The company, or subcontractors acting on its behalf, has means of informing jobseekers at the point of recruitment that workers do not pay fees or costs for any services directly related to temporary assignment or permanent placement.
  • The company or receiving country recruiter has a verification process to ensure that workers are not charged any fees.
  • Workers found to have been charged fees are repaid, and contracts with recruiters found to have charged fees are terminated.
Contracts of employment
  • All candidates are clearly informed of the terms and conditions of employment, and successful candidates are provided a copy of the contract prior to deployment.
  • All workers are provided a signed copy of their original contract, in a language they understand, prior to deployment.
  • The company explains the terms and conditions of the contract, and has means to verify that said terms are clearly understood and fully agreed to by the workers.
  • Employment contracts clearly specify the rights and responsibilities of workers with regard to wages; hours of work, including regular hours and overtime requirements; days off and annual leave; and disciplinary and other procedures that can lead to termination, as well as appeal procedures consistent with local law.
  • The details of working conditions described at the point of recruitment are consistent with the details contained in the employment contract at the time of hiring, and with actual job conditions and responsibilities.
  • Company policy prohibits the substitution of original contract provisions with those that are less favorable to the worker. Any amendments made to improve conditions are made with the knowledge and the informed, written consent of the worker.
  • Changes to working conditions are made with the knowledge and consent of the worker. Consent is obtained voluntarily and without the threat of penalty. No changes are made that in any way diminish the worker’s originally anticipated wages, benefits, or other conditions of work; or place the worker in a position of physical or mental risk or peril, or other form of disadvantage or vulnerability.
  • Employment contracts clearly stipulate the rights and responsibilities of each party regarding the termination of employment.
  • Employment contracts clearly specify the circumstances in which a worker can terminate his or her contract without penalty, given reasonable notice, and in accordance with national law.
Document retention
  • Applicants’ or workers’ passports, residency or work permits or other personal documents, such as bank books or automatic teller machine (ATM) cards, are not kept or withheld for any reason.
  • In the event that personal documents are held by the employer or subcontractor due to legal requirements or upon request by the worker, these are immediately returned to the worker upon demand and without any preconditions. In such circumstances, the employer or subcontractor:
    • Provides workers with an exact copy of personal documentation when not in their possession;
    • Develops written policies and procedures to prevent abuse;
    • Nominates a responsible person to ensure workers have unhindered access to their documents upon demand; and
    • Notifies workers of these procedures.
  • Lengthy or otherwise burdensome prerequisites for accessing one’s passport or other personal documents, such as written requests, monetary deposits or waiting periods, are strictly prohibited.
  • Migrant workers are provided with a locked, secure storage space for personal documents and valuables.
Deposits
  • Workers are not required to post a bond at the time of recruitment or at any other time during the employment relationship.
  • The company policies strictly prohibit the collection of deposits or security payments.
  • The company, or subcontractor acting on its behalf, withholds portions of workers’ pay only where it is legally required.
  • In those cases where migrant workers have opted to participate in voluntary savings schemes facilitated by their employer, such workers have unhindered access to and full control over all savings and monies owed at the time of contract termination.
Humane treatment
  • Company policies and procedures prohibit sanctions that impose work or wage deductions as a means to discipline workers.
  • No form of compulsory labor is imposed on any worker.
  • The policy of the company, or subcontractor acting on its behalf, strictly prohibits the use or threat of physical or sexual violence, harassment and intimidation, and senior management has expressed clear commitment to this policy.
  • Effective measures are in place to implement, monitor, and ensure company-wide compliance with this policy.
  • There is no evidence of complaints, grievances, or actions taken against the company, its managers or supervisors with respect to violence, intimidation, or harassment in the workplace. In cases where a complaint or grievance has been raised, evidence should show that swift and transparent action was taken to address it.
Workplace equality
  • All workers, regardless of their national origin, ethnicity, race, or legal status, are treated equally in the workplace.
  • Migrant workers are treated no less favorably than country nationals with respect to:
    • Remuneration, hours of work, overtime arrangements, and holidays with pay;
    • Membership in labor unions;
    • Accommodation; and
    • Benefits and social insurance, including social security, maternity and sick leave, disability and employment injury insurance.
  • The company, or subcontractors acting on its behalf, explicitly prohibits the abuse of vulnerability of migrant workers, including the threat of denunciation to authorities as a means of coercion.
Wages and benefits
  • The freedom of workers to dispose of their wages is not limited in any way.
  • Wages specified in employment contracts meet legal or industry minimum wage standards in the country of employment, and wage calculations are equitable and objective.
  • Wage payments are not deferred, delayed, or withheld as a means of binding workers to employment.
  • Non-cash or “in-kind” payments are not used as a means to create a state of dependency of the worker on the employer.
  • Wage rates and payments are calculated with full transparency.
  • The calculation and payment of wages, including legal wage deductions, are clearly explained to workers, and undertaken preferably with written worker consent.
  • No unlawful or unauthorized deductions are made from workers’ wages.
  • Wage deductions levied for tardiness or absence are not excessive and are commensurate to the time missed on the job, for example 10 minutes worth of pay for 10 minutes tardiness.
  • Wage advances or loans provided to workers, along with related interest rates, comply with the law.
    • Interest rates and repayment terms are fair, such that loans can be repaid in a reasonable amount of time in short installment or financing periods not exceeding the remaining term of the contract;
    • Provision of loans or advances, the calculation of interest rates and wage deductions made for their repayment are made with complete transparency to the worker;
    • The terms of wage advances and their repayment are agreed to by both parties in advance and in written form.
  • Jobseekers, applicants or workers are not required to participate in any form of forced or mandatory savings in order to recoup costs associated with recruitment or other services.
  • Where the company, or subcontractors acting on its behalf, is required or requested to remit workers’ earnings to a third party, this is only done with workers’ prior knowledge and full and voluntary consent, and with provision of receipt for full amount remitted.
  • If migrant workers are required by law to pay for room and board, such charges:
    • Do not exceed market rates or the rate paid by local workers;
    • Should not aid companies or subcontractors in earning a profit at workers’ expense; and
    • Are not part of efforts to reclaim placement fees or other fees paid by employers for worker recruitment.
Working hours
  • Workers are not forced to work more than the number of hours allowed by national law, or, where the law is silent, working hours do not exceed eight per day and forty-eight per week, and total working hours including overtime does not exceed 60 hours in a week.
  • Effective workplace and company-wide measures are adopted to ensure full implementation and compliance with this policy.
  • All overtime work is purely voluntary, unless specifically stated otherwise in a legally recognized collective bargaining agreement.
  • Workers are free to refuse overtime work without threat or fear of punishment or reprisal.
  • For those that agree to work overtime, a system is in place to obtain their written consent at the time of the request.
  • In cases where remuneration is based on productivity targets, for example piece rate, workers are not forced to work more overtime hours than allowed by national law in order to achieve their production quota.
Freedom of movement and personal freedom
  • Workers enjoy reasonable freedom of movement within their work and living environments. Any legitimate constraints on such movement in the workplace are specified prior to the signing of the employment contract.
  • The presence of security personnel or other security measures in the workplace or employer- or recruiter-operated residences are not used as a means to restrict worker freedom of movement.
  • No other coercive means are used to restrict migrant workers’ freedom of movement or personal freedom, including confiscation of personal documents, levying of financial penalties or security deposits, or use of deception in wage payment and deductions.
  • Workers are not required to live in employer- or recruiter-operated residences as a condition of recruitment or continued employment.
  • Migrant workers are free to return to their home country during paid leave, without any penalty, or threat of termination.
Grievance procedures
  • Supplier and recruiter policy and practice reveals a functioning and effective grievance procedure available to migrant workers.
  • Effective measures are in place to ensure that migrant workers know how to use this procedure and feel safe and free from potential retaliation if doing so.
  • Where grievances are raised, effective and appropriate procedures are in place to ensure a rapid and mutually agreed settlement.
Private employment agencies and labor recruiters
  • The supplier should hire migrant workers directly whenever possible.
  • When the recruitment, selection, and hiring of workers is undertaken by a private employment agency or other third-party, suppliers shall have the responsibility to ensure that the agencies operate legally, are certified or licensed by the competent authority, and do not engage in fraudulent behavior that places workers at risk of forced labor or trafficking for labor exploitation.
  • The company signs a formal contract with the subcontracted agency and performs due diligence on the agency and its partners involved in the hiring and placement of migrant workers.
  • Effective measures are established by the company to ensure the legal compliance of sub-contractors in each jurisdiction in which they operate.
  • The subcontracted agency has an up-to-date license or permit to operate in all countries of operation, and any partners or agents working on its behalf also have up-to-date permits or licenses.
  • The subcontracted agency has not been cited, suspended, or otherwise sanctioned for non-compliance with any laws in any country of operation; or, where a citation for non-compliance exists, the agency can demonstrate that it has rectified the non-compliance.
  • The company has mechanisms to ensure that no deception, fraud and/or coercion in the recruitment, placement, transport or management of migrant workers take place.
    • The company, or subcontractors acting on its behalf, provides jobseekers with accurate details of working conditions at the time of recruitment, including the nature of work, wages, benefits and duration of contract.
    • Details of working and employment conditions are communicated to jobseekers in a language they understand.
    • False promises are not made to applicants or workers regarding employment conditions, job locations, employment or contract duration, or anticipated earnings.
    • Training is provided to workers both before departure and upon arrival to ensure that they understand their own rights and employer obligations and responsibilities.
    • Pre-departure orientation is conducted to review contractual obligations, terms and conditions of work and other matters including but not limited to living conditions, company policies, and any grievance mechanisms that may be in place for workers.
  • The subcontracted agency has an implementing structure, an accountable officer, and clear procedures to ensure that all policies are compliant with all relevant legislation and regulations. This includes a current registry of laws for all countries of operation; and a mechanism that ensures the company is regularly informed of new legislation/regulations or changes in legislation/regulations.
  • The subcontracted agency has a code of conduct that prohibits forced labor and human trafficking and sets out protective measures for migrant workers. The code covers principles elaborated in relevant ILO Conventions and the Code of Conduct of the International Confederation of Private Employment Agencies (CIETT), and applies to all parties in the chain of recruitment. The code is supported by an institutional structure that ensures its effective implementation.
  • The subcontracted agency has established a mechanism for confidential reporting of noncompliance, a grievance mechanism, procedures of investigation and reporting on grievances, and protection for whistleblowers.
  • The subcontracted agency has established effective remediation procedures in case of verified reports of noncompliance, including mechanisms to ensure the reimbursement of workers for any recruitment fees charged.
  • The company, or subcontractors acting on its behalf, does not use any means to restrict migrant workers’ freedom to terminate employment, for example by levying excessive recruitment fees, requiring deposits, or withholding personal documentation.

2.2 Raising awareness and building capacity

Overview

Guidance for brands and suppliers to prevent forced labor in global supply chains, with tools for risk analysis, training, and recruiter oversight.

Explore this section

Introduction

Your commitment to mitigating the risk of forced labor in your supply chain is a competitive advantage. Ensuring that line managers, human resources personnel, and all third-party suppliers understand the importance of social responsibility compliance, particularly around issues of forced labor and trafficking of migrant workers, translates to a safer and more productive workforce. It assures clients – international brands – and other key stakeholders that industry Codes of Conduct will be easily applied and properly implemented in the supply chain.

Engaging people in your company will help you meet your commitment to minimize the risk of forced labor, debt bondage and trafficking in your company and supply chain.

It’s helpful to identify which levels and employees in your organization will require increased specific knowledge and skills to support your policies.

Questions for reflection include:

  • What current knowledge about forced labor, debt bondage and trafficking is already in place?
  • What procedures and decision-making processes in your organization impact these issues?
  • What knowledge, skills, and attitudes would you need to change to ensure that the employees accountable for these procedures act in ways that support your objective of staying forced-labor free?
  • What tools do you need to develop to support your employees’ ability to act and make decisions in their workplace, and in the context of their job functions, to ensure that your policies and procedures for staying forced-labor free are effective and sustainable?
  • Is everybody in the organization and in the supply chain incentivized to demonstrate behaviors that support your objectives?

Your answers to these questions will inform your communication and training program, which will build awareness and capacity at all levels of your organization.

The tools in this section provide information that you can translate into training and communication materials for different levels of employees within your organization and supply chain. As you begin to develop new policies and procedures within your organization to screen out and manage these issues in your operations, the employees in charge of new procedures will need to be trained to the level of detail that their jobs require.

Tool 1: What should you look for?

Identifying company risk & vulnerability to the human trafficking and forced labor of migrant workers

One way to better understand and raise awareness about the relationship between labor recruiters and the trafficking of migrant workers into forced labor is to clearly identify common forms of exploitation linked to this type of abuse. The following indicators or “red flags” of risk and vulnerability identify these forms of exploitation. They set out the common practices used by recruiters and employers that leave migrant workers in extreme situations of vulnerability to forced labor.This cluster of practices – which may occur independently, though are most often found in combination – are “enablers” or contributors to human trafficking and forced labor. Identifying them as “red flags” is a key first step in detecting and remediating hiring traps and promoting fair hiring in the global economy.

Red flags of risk and vulnerability to recruiter-induced hiring traps

1. Setting the Stage
The following issues are starting points for analysis. If one or more of these preconditions for risk of trafficking and forced labor among migrant workers is present, further evaluation should be performed.

  • Presence of migrant workers: Any workplace in which migrant workers are present should be considered at risk for forced labor. Even those with only a handful of migrant workers are not exempt from this risk.
  • Use of labor recruiters: When migrant workers are hired through recruiters, the conditions of their recruitment and hiring are no longer under the control of, or even readily apparent to, employers. This risk is further magnified when labor recruiters use sub-recruiters or subcontractors.
  • Informality in recruitment and hiring: The use of labor recruiters (or sub-recruiters used at any point in the process of recruiting, hiring and on-site management of workers) that either do not operate legally or do not have the required license granted by the relevant public authority in countries of operation is an important sign of risk.
  • Long employment “supply chain”: The longer the “chain” between worker and employer the higher the likelihood that abuse may occur. Factors that may increase the length of the chain include the number of intermediaries and steps between the worker and the final place of employment as well as “degrees of separation,” which can include language barriers, cultural and social differences, and geographical distances.
  • Extremely Low Costs to Employer of Recruiter Services: By comparing how much workers must pay to secure a job with how much recruiters paid by the employer for their services, it can become apparent if the recruiter’s costs are so low that coercive methods in hiring and recruiting are more likely.
  • Binding Terms of Work Visa: If work visas strictly tie workers to one employer, workers may face strong “menace of penalty” for leaving an abusive job. Governments that allow the temporary contract-based hiring of migrant workers tend to have immigration and other laws that may restrict migrants’ mobility within the country, their reproductive rights, and even labor rights like the freedom to associate and bargain collectively. Though many of these laws have legitimate goals, they can be abused to control workers in ways that may violate not only standards on voluntary labor, but other standards, like non-discrimination and humane treatment.

Case study: Fernando from Guatemala – Tied to an abusive employer by legal visa

Fernando, originally from an indigenous area of Guatemala sought legal, short term employment in the US through the H2 guest worker program. A reputable recruiter in Guatemala offered Fernando a minimum wage job planting trees in North Carolina as an H2B worker. Fernando was trucked to New England to work long hours for less pay than he was promised. He was ordered never to leave the worksite, and signed a contract in English, a language which he could not read or speak. His passport was taken away and he was threatened with deportation if he complained or left. His living situation was deplorable and he found himself unable to meet unreasonable quotas. He was in debt for his original investment of US $2,000 for embassy interview, plane ticket and living expenses. However, under the terms of the H2B visa, he was not allowed to seek other employment. Had he left his employer, he could have been arrested, deported, and left with no way to repay his debt.

See Fernando’s full worker profile

2. The Bait: Recruitment and hiring

“The Bait” refers to factors that serve to entrap workers prior to their employment. Verité found two factors in recruitment and hiring to be almost universal factors in hiring traps: debt, and various types of deception, including contract substitution. Fraudulent visa practices were also found to be a strong indicator of vulnerability to trafficking and forced labor.

  • Amount and Location of Worker Debt: When debt is held by the employer or recruiter, there is a direct relationship of subservience and obligation that puts the worker at risk of forced labor. But the existence of any debt, even if it is held by an independent party not in collusion with the recruiter or employer, can make the worker more vulnerable to manipulation and abuse. Red flags associated with debt include:
    • The charging of illegal or excessive recruitment fees by recruiters;
    • Fraudulent practices in charging other fees, e.g. for services relating to travel and transportation, medical exams, health certificates, official documentation and/or skills testing; and/or
    • Substantial loans held by workers, with excessive interest rates and/or onerous financing schemes.

In focus: Excessive debt from recruitment fees
in India, Verité research found that migrants to Gulf Coast country states of the Middle East paid recruitment fees ranging from US$1200 to US$3800, amounts far above the legal limit. Workers used various means to finance their recruitment fees such as borrowing money from relatives, banks, or money lenders; selling assets such as jewelry; or taking out mortgages on family homes.

In the Philippines, Verité research found that the recruitment fees charged by agencies deploying for Taiwan ranged from US$3000 to almost US$4000. Workers reported being instructed to falsify their immigration paperwork, under-reporting their recruitment fees by as much as 80 percent. Workers financed their fees by borrowing from family members, banks or money lenders, often at very high rates.

Deception in Recruitment and Hiring: Deception in recruitment and hiring – especially when combined with worker debt – is a major red flag. Types of deception can include:

      • Deception or false promises made at the time of recruitment and hiring with regard to the terms and conditions of employment, including job type, availability of work, location, length of contract, salary and benefits;
      • The terms and conditions of employment agreed upon at the time of recruitment are not those contained in the employment contract. Changes have been made without the knowledge or consent of the worker;
      • The original contract provisions agreed to at the time of recruitment are replaced by provisions less favorable to the worker, either one or more times over the course of the hiring and deployment process (this is called “contract substitution”) or once the worker arrives at the worksite (through so-called “supplemental agreements”);
      • The terms and conditions of recruitment, transportation, employment and living accommodations have not been communicated to the workers.

In focus: Sample supplemental agreement clauses

“I agree that for safekeeping, the employer shall keep my passport until termination of the employment contract.

“I understand and agree to pay monthly and other fees required in employment related documents during my employment. The factory will deduct the fees from my salary, or in the event that my salary is not sufficient, from my savings fund.”

“I acknowledge that the factory can deduct TWD 3000 from my payroll account and transfer it to a savings account until the contract expires. I cannot withdraw or close the savings account without approval.”

  • Fraudulent Visa Practices: Visa fraud, in which recruiters take fees and deliver a fraudulent visa or no visa at all can leave workers in debt or possibly imprisoned.

Case study: Abdul from India – Imprisoned for fake visa

Abdul was promised a work visa through a Mumbai-based recruitment agency for a mechanic job in Dubai. He paid US$1,675 to the recruiter/agent for recruitment fee, work visa and plane ticket. Upon arrival at the Dubai aiport, Abdul’s visa was found to be counterfeit. He was taken into custody and imprisoned for eight months. Because he did not speak the local language, he could not communicate with immigration officials. His family was finally able to pay an additional US$491 to get him out of jail.

See Abdul’s full worker profile

  • Coercion in Recruitment and Hiring: Migrants are threatened with denunciation to authorities to coerce acceptance of employment or specific employment terms.
  • Informality in Recruitment and Hiring: A final red flag in the recruitment and hiring phase is the use of labor recruiters that either do not operate legally or do not have the required license granted by the relevant public authority in countries of operation.

3. The switch: Revealed in the workplace

“The Switch” refers to conditions that bind within the job. Once on-the-job, migrant workers who are highly leveraged due to excessive recruitment fees, and/or who were subject to deception in recruitment and hiring, are exceedingly vulnerable to exploitation. In Verité’s experience, employers engage in a range of practices that exacerbate vulnerability to forced labor.

In focus: Labor recruiter as on-site manager leads to exploitation

In the United States, an organic farmer contracted out the management of his migrant workers to a small labor recruiter who financed the smuggling of workers into the country from Mexico. While undocumented workers who were managed directly by the farmer lived and worked in relatively good conditions, workers smuggled from Mexico and managed by the recruiter were underpaid, threatened with violence and deeply in debt. The organic farmer was unaware of the situation and “shocked” to find out about the conditions of these workers.

  • Use of a Labor Recruiter as an On-Site Manager: Where labor recruiters manage the work and/or living conditions of migrants on-site, risk of abusive practices is high.
  • Confiscation of Identity Documents: Confiscation or withholding of passports in particular – but also residency permits, work permits or other valuable personal possessions – is one of the most chronic abuses reported by migrant workers around the globe. Employers often rationalize that they are holding passports or other official documents for safekeeping, but in fact workers often do not feel comfortable requesting access to their documents, and/or the process for gaining access to their documents is onerous and intimidating. Without papers, a migrant worker cannot freely and safely move about or leave a host country, and is at risk of imprisonment if stopped and questioned by police.

In focus: Passport confiscation in IT factories in malaysia

In IT factories in Malaysia, workers reported to Verité that they are required to turn over their passports to their employer. In order for workers to be allowed to “borrow” their passports, they are often required to sign a logbook indicating their reasons for doing so. In some companies, workers were denied access to their passports until the end of their contract. At one agency, workers were required to give monetary deposits for borrowing their own passports.

Deductions, Fines, Withholdings and Illegally Low Pay: Take-home pay is rarely as high as a migrant worker was told it would be by her labor recruiter. Several mechanisms contribute to the disparity.

  • Forced savings programs – where a portion of the worker’s salary is withheld and deposited into a savings account to which the worker does not have access until her term of work is complete – significantly deplete a worker’s take-home pay and ability to pay off debt. In Taiwan, for example, forced savings of up to 30% of the worker’s salary is legally permitted;
  • The levying of un-anticipated (and sometimes excessive, unexplained or illegal) deductions for items such as food, housing, or travel can further induce indebtedness;
  • Earnings can be depleted if wages are withheld, delayed or unpaid; or if workers are forced to accept non-cash payments or payments in kind; and/or
  • In some cases workers are required to use a portion of their salary to lodge financial deposits or “security” fees, e.g. as “runaway insurance”.

Case study: Benny from the Philippines – Deceived and in debt

After graduating from a four-year computer school in the Philippines, Benny could not find any work so he turned to a labor recruiter to help him get a job in an IT factory in Taiwan. He was charged US$2,223 for his recruitment and traveling fees, for which he borrowed money from his mother. Upon arrival in Taiwan, he was told that his fees were converted to Taiwanese dollars which increased his debt by 150 percent. He was also only paid half of what he was expecting due to cost of living expenses and a forced savings of 30 percent. Benny was required to work six to seven days a week, 12 hours a day and overtime was mandatory. By the end of his contract he was forced to pay another US$444 to extend his contract.

Soon after that, the factory announced that they could no longer afford to keep all of the employees but his extension fee would not be returned to him. He was also informed that his forced savings were slotted for his return ticket home. Benny returned to the Philippines with no money. His family’s home was flooded by a typhoon, and he is applying for more work in Taiwan. This time, he hopes to go with an “honest” recruiter.

See Benny’s full worker profile

  • Employer Control of Bank Account: Employer or recruiter access to workers’ bank accounts creates powerful leverage for the employer or recruiter over the worker. A worker may feel trapped in his job because he fears that his earnings will be taken away if he complains or attempts to leave.
  • Lack of Freedom to Terminate Employment: Employers and recruiters may use a variety of coercive means to restrict migrant workers’ freedom to terminate employment, including:
    • Breach-of-contract penalties that force workers to stay in jobs by imposing financial penalties for voluntary or involuntary termination of the contract;
    • Informal threats of loss of wages, savings or deposits; and/or
    • Threat or use of violence, harassment or intimidation.
  • Restrictions on Freedom of Movement: Migrant workers may be subjected to any number of restrictions on their ability to move freely in the host country, including:
    • Tenancy in employer-operated residences is compulsory as a condition of recruitment and/or continued employment;
    • Presence of security personnel or other security measures in the workplace or at residences restrict freedom of movement;
    • Migrant workers are not free to return to their country of origin during paid leave or holidays; and/or
    • Imprisonment or physical confinement in the workplace or related premises, e.g. employer-operated residences.
  • Isolation: Geographic, social, cultural, or even language isolation can trap migrant workers at a work site. By isolating workers and becoming their sole source of food, information and communication, labor recruiters can render workers incapable of independent action.

Case study: Rani from India – Isolated and abused through the Sumangali scheme

Fifteen year old Rani lives in a small village in India. When she was 13, a recruiter promised her a good job with a lump sum payment at the end of three years, which could help pay her dowry. She worked in a spinning mill where she worked with harsh chemicals and bleach. Her monthly stipend, after deductions for food and lodging, came to under US$20 a month. She was left with burns on her skin. She was not allowed to go anywhere unattended and rarely left her hostel. She was not allowed to speak to anyone, including her family. She was subjected to harassment and abuse in both the factory and hostel. She was told that she would not receive any of the lump sum payment if she complained.

See Rani’s full worker profile

  • Threats and Violence: Threats and violence are not necessary to entrap workers, but when used, threats and violence are effective ways of “beating down” workers, rendering them compliant and fearful of possible retributions to themselves or their families.

Tool 2: Understanding the role of labor recruiters

Understanding the role of labor recruiters in the human trafficking and forced labor of migrant workers

Modern-day slavery is thriving. According to the International Labor Organization (ILO), a minimum of 20.9 million people are victims of forced labor worldwide at any given time. Of these, over 2.4 million are victims of forced labor that results from human trafficking. A growing number of these victims are migrant workers who have been trafficked for “legal” employment in factories, on farms, at construction sites, in homes, and elsewhere.

What is forced labor?

The ILO defines forced labor as “all work or service which is exacted from any person under the menace of any penalty and for which said person has not offered himself voluntarily.” This means that a person is in a forced labor situation if they have entered into a job against their freedom of choice and cannot leave that job without facing a penalty or a threat of penalty of any kind. A penalty, in this case, could be physical constraint or punishment, or it could refer to other forms of abuse such as threats of deportation, the confiscation of passports, or the non-payment of wages that effectively binds a worker to a job or employer.

What is human trafficking?

Human trafficking can lead to forced labor. It involves the movement of a person, usually across international borders though increasingly also within the boundaries of a single country, by means of threat, deception or abuse of vulnerability for the purpose of exploitation. The United Nations Palermo Protocol of 2000, which provides the internationally-accepted definition of human trafficking, states that this abuse involves three key elements: actions, means and purpose.

  • Actions: Include the recruitment, transportation, harboring, and receipt of a person – a woman, man, or a child.
  • Means: Refers to the threat or use of force, deception, or the abuse of vulnerability and power.
  • Purpose: Refers to exploitation, including forced labor, servitude, slavery, and practices similar to slavery.

When a human being is trafficked for the purposes of forced labor, the result is modern day slavery.

The global scope of the problem

Forced labor and human trafficking are truly global phenomena. They exist in every region in the world and in every type of economy, whether a country is industrialized, developing or in transition. They affect both international and domestic markets, and no sector or industry can be considered immune to or untainted by the risk of this abuse. Key industries revealed by global research to be vulnerable to human trafficking and forced labor include:

  • Apparel manufacturing and footwear;
  • Agriculture and horticulture;
  • Construction and infrastructure;
  • Electronics manufacturing and information technology;
  • Forestry and logging;
  • Mining and extractives;
  • Food processing and packaging; and
  • Health care and other personal care services.
Labor recruiters: a key piece of the human trafficking puzzle

The middlemen or intermediaries who facilitate employment for migrant workers are an important part of the human trafficking picture. Typically referred to as recruiters or labor recruiters, these middlemen often play a legitimate and useful role in job placement. But as Verité’s research has found, this widespread system of labor recruitment is often opaque, sometimes corrupt, and largely lacking in accountability. What’s more, the debt and deception that brokers often introduce to the recruitment and hiring process can create critical vulnerabilities to trafficking and forced labor for migrant workers.

Labor recruiters are typically subcontracted for the recruitment and hiring of migrants. They act as facilitators between those workers and their eventual employers and assume functions ranging from matching aspiring workers to jobs around the world or in other parts of the country, arranging for visas, making travel arrangements, providing pre-departure orientation or training, or even negotiating contracts. In some cases, labor recruiters also manage migrant workers at the job site. While recruiters play a legitimate – perhaps indispensible – role in the smooth and efficient functioning of global supply chain production, their presence makes workers more vulnerable to forced labor. When there are problems in outsourced recruitment and hiring workers may be trapped in debt-bondage.

How do labor recruiters increase the risk of debt bondage?

Recruiter-induced forced labor occurs when a migrant worker is deceived by a labor recruiter during the recruitment and hiring process, often heavily saddled with debt that results from excessive recruitment and other service fees, and facing any number of coercive circumstances at the workplace exacted by an employer that the worker may be “tied to” as a result of restrictive work-visa regulations. In the labor recruiter-worker relationship, the terms of work, and the responsibilities of the recruiter to the worker, are often poorly defined and poorly understood. Once a worker is on-the-job at a foreign workplace – with a large loan and attendant interest payments – it is difficult, if not impossible, to escape. The result is a condition of force that Verité calls the hiring trap; there are few global workplace problems in more urgent need of attention today.

What role do employers play in recruiter-induced forced labor?

Employers, often inadvertently, “flip the switch” on the hiring trap by providing a job that pays less than what the labor recruiter had promised to the worker. They may also contribute to the abuse that ties the worker to the job by:

  • Withholding passports;
  • Controlling worker bank accounts;
  • Placing migrant workers in physical isolation; or
  • Levying deductions and withholding wages that further diminish workers’ take-home pay and ability to pay off their debt.
Understanding the risk to business: making the case for action

The abuse faced by trafficked migrant workers – e.g. the deception of dishonest labor recruiters, the induced indebtedness and the coercive practices used by employers in the workplace – present a myriad of risks to global business. These risks can take a variety of forms, and can present themselves across a variety of business “locations”, including:

  • Within a company’s own operations;
  • Across global supply chains;
  • In the murky waters of extensive sub-contracting and outsourcing systems;
  • At the commodity “base” of the value chain; or
  • Through the deceptive actions of third party business partners or service providers, such as labor recruiters, security services or cleaning companies.

Risk may be direct or indirect, and may take forms that a company or brand may or may not be aware of. To make sense of this complexity, the chart below indicates the different types of risk that pose a threat to business. Taken together, they present a clear case for taking effective action against recruiter-induced forced labor.

Forms of forced labor risk

Legal Risk

Forced labor and human trafficking are considered crimes in most countries around the world. Companies found involved or complicit in such activity could face prosecution resulting in criminal or civil sanctions including fines, compensation to victims and imprisonment. Forced labor and human trafficking are also considered violations of international human rights law.

Threats to Brand Value & Company Reputation
Allegations of forced labor and human trafficking can present serious threats to brand value and company reputation, particularly for those companies operating in consumer goods industries. Brand “contamination” can be difficult to reverse, and allegations such as these can threaten both existing and future business partnerships, resulting in a loss of contracts and/or future business opportunities.

Trade-Related Risk

In some countries, trade regulations strictly prohibit the import of goods that have been produced by trafficked or forced labor. In these jurisdictions, allegations of abuse can result in imported goods being seized by public authorities, inspected, and released only when shown to be untainted.

Threats to investment and finance

Allegations of human rights abuse, forced labor and human trafficking can significantly threaten investor relations and risk divestment from both ethical and mainstream investors. They can also jeopardize access to public funds such as export credits, as public authorities increasingly link the financial support they provide to business with proven ethical performance.

What can brands and suppliers do to combat the human trafficking and forced labor of migrant workers?

There are many steps that companies can take within their own operations and in their supply chains to prevent, detect and remediate recruiter-led human trafficking and forced labor. Refer to the other sections of the Verité Fair Hiring toolkit for ways that your brand can take action.

Further resources:
Verité, a fair hiring framework for responsible business, 2011.
Veité, help wanted: hiring, human trafficking & modern-day slavery in the global economy, 2010.

2.3 Screening and evaluating labor recruiters

Overview

Guidance for companies on screening and selecting ethical labor recruiters to prevent forced labor in migrant worker recruitment, including criteria, due diligence methods, and risk indicators for compliance.

Explore this section

Introduction

Screening and evaluating labor recruiters

If your company is outsourcing the recruitment, hiring, or management of migrant workers to a labor recruiter, there are a number of proactive measures you can take to make sure that things proceed smoothly, safely, and legally.

The most important step in this process is to select the right recruiter at the outset. There are many ethical, efficient, and legal labor recruiters that can meet your business needs operating in the market. The challenge is in finding and engaging them, while avoiding engagement with unethical agencies or individuals.

To help with this process, companies seeking to hire labor recruiters should conduct a pre-selection review in both the sending and receiving countries. Such a review will help to prioritize and select labor recruiters that are able to demonstrate that they:

  • operate in compliance with the law;
  • identify, screen out, and manage risks of forced labor (and other legal and social compliance violations) in their business processes; and
  • observe the “employers pay” principle of not charging any fee or cost for recruitment to workers, directly or indirectly, in whole or in part.

Tool 1 offers some sample questions and a rating system to assist companies in designing a screening process for labor recruiter candidates, and deciding which labor recruiter to hire.

Tool 2 provides more detail on key areas of concern in the screening process.

There are also other measures that companies can take to proactively address these issues. For example, companies can work with other stakeholders such as governments, non-profit organizations, or labor unions to support the development of a robust system of regulation and enforcement of recruiter activity.

Companies should also seek to support voluntary accreditation programs, where such programs set standards for labor recruiters that encourage them to adopt good practice.

Once a labor recruiter is hired, companies should put in place clear procedures to manage and monitor the labor recruiter’s operations. See the following section, on Managing Labor Brokers and Monitoring for Ethical Recruitment and Hiring, for more information.

Tool 1: Criteria for screening labor recruiter candidates

Establishing criteria for screening and evaluating labor recruiter candidates

When developing a system for screening labor recruiters, a supplier or brand should ensure that the following key elements are included:

  • The criteria for screening labor recruiters are clearly defined, and incorporate:
    • All legal requirements in the country of operation; and
    • All social responsibility requirements of the supplier and its brand clients.
  • A methodology for evaluating labor recruiters against the screening criteria is established.
  • The approval process for new recruiters is defined, and includes:
    • A process for rating labor recruiters , and the conditions for passing/failing; and
    • An indication of who will make the final decision on selecting a recruiter and concluding a contract.

In this due diligence process, the company needs to obtain enough information to have reasonable confidence that the labor recruiter will be compliant with its standards for ethical performance. Such a process entails looking for the “presence or absence” of policies and procedures that relate to issues of ethical performance.

Assessing the recruiter’s performance itself will happen later, as part of the management and monitoring process. (For more information, see Managing Labor Recruiters and Monitoring for Ethical Recruitment and Hiring.)

Defining the evaluation criteria

In order to evaluate labor recruiters, Verité recommends defining a set of social responsibility requirements that complement your company’s legal requirements (compliance to law, license to operate) and technical requirements (ability to source workers within a timeframe and budget). For example, your company will want to know about the labor recruiter’s policies or approach to preventing forced labor, its approach to manpower pooling, etc.

Each company will have its own specific criteria in this area. To determine criteria, a company can undertake a careful review of the legal requirements in the sending country and country of operation. You should also review your company’s code of conduct or other high-level policy language, and any such requirements of your clients.

Once the screening criteria have been defined, each criterion should be paired with indicator(s) that serve to measure whether the criterion is being met. For example:

Sample criteria and sample indicators

Compliance with legal standards

  • The recruiter is fully licensed.
  • The recruiter has no record of legal sanctions in the past three years.

Compliance with broad social responsibility standards

  • The recruiter formally expresses a commitment to uphold the company’s social (labor and ethics) standards.
  • The recruiter has written policy and commitment statements that address social (labor and ethics) standards.

Compliance with standards on recruitment fees and expenses

  • The recruiter has a policy stating that workers are not charged recruitment fees.
  • The recruiter has a procedure for verifying that workers are not charged fees by sending country agents (e.g., worker interviews, a plan for periodic worker surveys, receipt review, etc.).

Compliance with standards on employment contracts

  • The recruiter has a policy to ensure that workers’ contracts meet legal and company requirements.
Conducting a screening interview

When conducting a screening interview, the labor recruiter should be asked to describe how they are able to meet this set of selection criteria. In the table below, Verité offers some examples of questions that could be asked in this regard.

Sample criteria: Compliance with legal standards

  • The recruiter is fully licensed.
  • The recruiter has no record of legal sanctions in the past three years.
    • Sample indicators:
      • Does the labor recruiter have a valid license to operate?
      • Has the labor recruiter been subject to any labor and ethics regulatory actions where monetary penalties were assessed?
      • Where formal corrective actions were mandated by the issuing government agency, can the recruiter provide documentation to show that violations have been corrected or are on-track for correction?
      • Does the labor recruiter agree to adhere to the legal requirements of the sending and receiving countries, and to register its agreement by signing a contract or memorandum-of-agreement with the hiring company to this effect?

Sample criteria: Compliance with broad social responsibility standards

  • The recruiter expresses a commitment to uphold the company’s social (labor and ethics) standards.
  • The recruiter has written policy and commitment statements that address social (labor and ethics) standards.
    • Sample indicators:
      • What is the scope and coverage of the labor recruiter’s labor and ethics policy?
      • Does the labor recruiter’s labor and ethics policy have executive management endorsement?

Sample criteria: Compliance with standards on recruitment fees and expenses

  • The recruiter has a policy stating that workers are not charged recruitment fees.
  • The recruiter has a procedure for verifying that workers are not charged fees by sending country agents (e.g., worker interviews, a plan for periodic worker surveys, receipt review, etc.).
    • Sample indicators:
      • Does the labor recruiter have a no-fee policy on recruitment fees and expenses?
      • Does the labor recruiter’s policy on recruitment fees and expenses have executive management endorsement?
      • Where in your recruitment, selection and hiring process do you think the risk of noncompliance to the no-fee policy is highest?
      • What operational controls have you put in place to minimize these identified risks and to ensure that workers are not charged fees? Following are some examples of controls:
      • Policies and procedures are in place to implement the no-fee statement in the code of conduct.
      • Evidence of a safe procedure for workers to report violations by internal staff or subagents of the no-fee policy. Such a procedure should include an investigation and response to reports of violations.
      • A policy and implementing procedures that prevent the use of illegal subagents/subcontractors.
      • If the recruiter/agency uses subagents/subcontractors, a procedure to ensure these subagents are paid by the agency for their services and that they sign and comply with the agency’s no-fee policy.
      • If workers are being recruited from remote or interior regions, the recruiter has staff (under the recruiter’s payroll) in these areas.

Sample criteria: Compliance with standards on employment contracts

  • The recruiter has a policy to ensure that workers’ contracts meet legal and company requirements.
    • Sample indicators:
      • Are the terms of the workers’ contracts and the contracting process itself consistent with sending and receiving country laws?
      • Does the employment contract include terms and conditions that are consistent or aligned with the hiring company’s ethical standards?
Evaluating the results and making a final decision

After labor recruiter candidates have been screened, the responses must be analyzed. Verité recommends the use of a transparent methodology for evaluating labor recruiters against screening criteria. Such a methodology should define how candidates will be evaluated, by whom, and the process by which a final decision will be made and a contract issued.

One approach is to use a rating system that assigns each criterion a weight and performance score. This allows you to score each recruiter candidate’s performance on each criteria, while also giving appropriate emphasis to the areas of compliance that are most important to your company.

The results of such a rating process allows for the performance of all candidates to be cross-analyzed and compared with ease, which will then allow you to rank and compare candidates.

Example of a Rating System

Example of a Rating System

Criteria

Weight (%)

Sample Score (%)

Performance Rating

Compliance with legal standards

30

Compliance with social responsibility standards

40

Compliance with standards on recruitment fees and expenses

30

Compliance with standards on employment contracts

Total

100

Note: Weights given to the above criterion are provided as an example. Companies should determine their own weighting systems based on their policies and (where relevant) those of their clients.

Once the successful labor recruiter candidate has been selected and hired, suppliers and brands can use the information from this due-diligence selection process as baseline data for managing and monitoring the performance of the recruiter.

Tool 2: Key issues of concern in candidate screening

Key issues of concern in screening and evaluating labor recruiter candidates

This tool introduces some key issues that should be included in the screening of labor recruiter candidates, including:

  • Business profile;
  • Organizational/management culture and values;
  • Managing the supply chain;
  • Processes for recruitment, selection and hiring; and
  • Recruitment fees

For each topic area, the need and context for screening is explained, followed by a list of information to gather, and an articulation of key red flags and risks to look out for.

The goal for this tool is not only to provide some instructions for the screening process, but also to indicate how companies can later use the information from the screening to determine and manage social responsibility risk in the supply chain.

Screening area: Business profile

Why are you screening the labor recruiter’s business profile?
You are entering into a partnership with an external agent that will be undertaking vital functions on your behalf, the performance of which will influence the competency and quality of your workforce. There is also a potential risk of forced labor and trafficking if things go wrong.

Therefore you will want to know as much as possible about the labor recruiter’s track record and experience in different locations and for different services, and its capacity to provide the particular services that you require. You will also want to confirm that the labor recruiter is operating legally in all countries where it offers services.

Finally, obtaining a list of the labor recruiter’s other clients will allow you to seek references regarding the labor recruiter’s performance and ways of working.

What information do you need to get?

  • Business History and Background
  • Two List Item
    • Length of operations
    • Business size and volume
    • Geographical reach
    • Expansions/changes in size, volume, reach
    • Existing or past regulatory actions or civil and/or criminal legal cases and their outcomes
  • Ownership
    • Ownership structure (e.g., public, private, family-owned)
    • License to operate, registrations, certifications
    • Names and nationalities of owners
  • Nature of Services
    • Description of all services provided to companies
    • Description of all services provided to workers (e.g., provision of vocational or language/cultural training)
    • Countries of operation
  • Client Engagement
    • Name and number of clients
    • Relationship history
    • Volume of business
    • Services provided to each client
  • Government Relations
    • Describe any engagement with governments, including government accreditation programs, etc.

What are some common risks and red flags?

  • The ownership structure circumvents or is not in compliance with law (e.g., the presence of foreign owners in countries where foreign ownership is not allowed by law).
  • The labor recruitment is not legally registered in all countries of operation.
  • The labor recruitment or its owners have been subject to existing or past regulatory actions or civil and/or criminal legal cases.
  • The ownership of other businesses (e.g., a money-lending agency or a medical clinic) that jobseekers are required to use in order to get the job. This becomes an issue especially if the cost of these services is excessive when compared to prevailing market rates.
  • The marketing of free services to employers, or the charging of unusually low fees. This could be a red flag that the labor recruiter is earning the bulk of its revenue through charges to jobseekers.
  • Companies listed as clients cannot be contacted, and/or other vague or conflicting information. This is a red flag for transparency issues in terms of engagement.
Screening area: Organizational/management culture and values

Why are you screening the labor recruiter’s organizational structure and management culture/values?
As an employer you will want to know whether the labor recruiter has the capacity to deliver effective and efficient services that meet both your business requirements (e.g., quality of workers, timely turn-arounds) and your social responsibility requirements (e.g., no fees, transparency in contracts). You will want to understand whether the labor recruiter’s organizational culture and values mirror your own, especially in terms of their commitment to address forced labor, debt bondage, and trafficking; and whether these values are communicated to all staff, and embedded in staff recruitment, development and performance management systems. You will also want to obtain assurance that the labor recruiter will be willing and able to commit to transparency and continuous improvement for the duration of your partnership.

What information do you need to get?

  • Organizational Structure
    • How work is organized (by functional area, by industry, by geographic area)
    • The reporting structure and accountabilities for different functional areas
    • Staff sizes per functional area/geographic location; staff recruitment and retention; staff development and training, etc.
    • How business partners/agents/subcontractors are selected
  • Management Culture
    • Guiding principles and values of the labor recruiter, and the mechanisms for integrating these principles into business processes
    • Reporting mechanisms and procedures for corrective action
    • Code of Conduct awareness and implementation
      • What has the labor recruiter done to implement the Code requirements of its clients?
      • Who is accountable for code performance?
      • Are there examples of changes in the way the labor recruiter has managed the business to better meet clients’ Code requirements? What are they?

What are some common risks and red flags?

  • The labor recruiter does not have full-time staff, or is understaffed, or staff do not have the appropriate competencies for undertaking core processes (e.g., worker recruitment, selection). Any of these scenarios is a red flag that subcontractors may be involved.
  • Staff, when interviewed, have no knowledge of processes for ensuring the avoidance of forced labor in the performance of their functions.
  • Responsibilities to implement code standards (e.g., employers pay policy) are not clearly communicated agency-wide or indicated in job descriptions.
  • There are no sanctions or rewards related to staff performance on social responsibility standards.
  • There are no mechanisms to report violations by staff of clients’ Code of Conduct
  • Other clients reported an inability of the labor recruiter to meet code-of-conduct standards
  • There is a preponderance of vague or conflicting information that could be reasonably construed as indicating a transparency issue.

2.4 Managing labor recruiters and monitoring for ethical recruitment and hiring

Effective management of labor recruiters requires clear contractual performance criteria, regular monitoring, and proactive systems to prevent forced labor, debt bondage, and unethical recruitment practices across global supply chains.

Explore this section

Introduction

Once a labor recruiter has been selected, a robust management system should be put in place that includes the setting of performance criteria – elaborated in the contract with the labor recruiter – and regular monitoring to verify compliance.

In formalizing a business relationship with the labor recruiter, the brand or supplier should begin with these considerations:

What services do you want the labor recruiter to provide?

What are the legal, social and ethical performance requirements that you expect the labor recruiter to meet?

You may have already answered these questions in the process of screening and evaluating labor recruiter candidates. Verité’s benchmarks for good practice also can be used to assist suppliers in developing performance criteria for social compliance. These criteria should be included in the contract with the labor recruiter and can then be used as benchmarks to monitor for compliance and continuous improvement.

In addition to articulating performance criteria in the contract with the labor recruiter, there are many proactive management strategies that companies can employ to best ensure that legal and social compliance requirements are met. See Tool 1 for some examples.

Developing methods to monitor the performance of the labor recruiter is another critical step, and the result will be highly individualized based on the structure and operations of the supplier facility.

As part of any verification scheme, Verité recommends that incoming migrant workers recruited by labor recruiter should be interviewed to determine the conditions under which they were recruited. Verité also recommends beginning any verification process with a self-assessment that allows the recruiter the opportunity to respond directly to a set of questions from the supplier and “self report” on performance.

This affords an opportunity for the recruiter to be up-front about any challenges faced and solutions being explored. Such a process can set a positive tone for the assessment, emphasizing the desire not only for compliance but continuous improvement. Verité recommends that the self-assessment be followed by an audit-style verification process, completed by company staff or an independent third party.

See Tool 2 for further guidance on key issues to consider during a performance assessment process. Tools 3, 4, and 5 offer concrete sets of questions that can be adapted by companies in monitoring and evaluating recruiter performance.

Tool 1: Sample strategies for managing risk in recruitment, selection and hiring

Sample strategies for managing risk in recruitment, selection and hiring

There are many proactive steps that companies can take to manage the risk of forced labor and human trafficking in recruitment, selection and hiring.

Below are some of the more common red flags for forced labor and trafficking at these stages in the job cycle. In addition to the red flags themselves, consider the following management approaches that can help to mitigate the risks or address root causes so that risk is eliminated.

Red flag: Worker debt due to illegal or excessive recruitment fees

A common source of risk in recruitment is a company’s lack of visibility into the recruitment process itself, including a lack of visibility into any payment transactions that are involved.

The company may be simply unaware that recruiters hidden fees are being charged to jobseekers by recruiters or their subcontractors. There are many steps that can be taken to mitigate this risk.

Managing risk during recruitment, selection and hiring:

  • The company can require that its labor recruiters communicate an “employers pay” policy to applicants at the earliest part of the recruitment process. For example, this policy could be indicated in job vacancy ads and explained to applicants as part of a first interaction with recruiters (where applicable, this would entail informing applicants at their place of origin, before they arrive at recruitment centers).
  • The company can provide (or require labor recruiters to provide) successful applicants with a checklist of all expenses that employers will cover (consistent with the “employer pays” policy).

Managing risk during pre-departure orientation and deployment:

  • The company can require all successful jobseekers to submit a list of all expenses incurred in the process of applying for the job, indicating to whom these expenses or fees were paid (e.g., transportation expenses, reservation fees, documents processing, medical tests, etc.).
  • A company representative can conduct the pre-departure orientation.
  • The company representative can explain the following during the pre-departure orientation:
    • The company’s “employers pay” policy;
    • All expenses and fees that the company will cover;
    • The company’s system for verifying the actual fees and expenses paid by workers in recruitment and hiring;
    • The company’s confidential procedures for workers to report any violations to the “employer pays” policy; and
    • The company’s protections and non-reprisal for workers who report violations, with an explanation of how the company guarantees this.
  • The company can include in its contracts with migrant workers the “employer pays” policy and a breakdown of all expenses and fees that the company will cover.

Managing risk upon arrival at the host facility:

  • The company can require all newly hired workers to submit a list of expenses incurred prior to arrival, with the receipts if available. The company can then compare these documents with the lists that were submitted by migrant workers at the pre-departure orientation and flag any discrepancies for further investigation.
  • The company can conduct validation interviews with newly hired workers upon arrival. Interviews with workers whose expense checklists were flagged should be prioritized. Independent translators should be used for these validation interviews, as opposed to translators provided or hired by the labor recruiter.
  • The company can have in place remediation procedures to respond to verified reports of noncompliance to its “employers pay” policy, including mechanisms to ensure reimbursement of any fees charged to workers.
Red flag: Deception in recruitment – contract substitution

Contract substitution that results in debt bondage, restrictions to freedom of movement, or labor trafficking is usually deliberate – it rarely stems from a mere process gap.

In some cases, this risk can also stem from a labor recruiter’s desire to meet performance objectives. For example, if recruiters are required to deploy a certain number of workers to a factory at a particular time, they may use standard government-issued contracts which do not reflect the actual terms and conditions of employment to facilitate the deployment process. Instead, the actual terms and conditions are contained in the supplemental contract which the workers sign when they commence employment.

Companies can take any or all of the following steps to mitigate these risks.

Managing risk during recruitment, selection, and hiring:

  • The company can take full responsibility for the translation of employment contracts into a language that migrant workers understand. The labor recruiter should not translate the employment contracts, nor should the company hire the labor recruiter to manage the translation of the contracts.
  • The company can directly supervise the signing of employment contracts. A company representative can be present on-site in the sending country where workers have been selected and hired when employment agreements are signed by workers.
  • Before contracts are signed, the company can orient the workers on the terms and conditions of the employment contract. If there is a need to use translators, these translators should be directly engaged by the company – the company should not use translators provided by the labor recruiter.

Managing risk during pre-departure orientation and deployment:

  • A company representative can conduct the pre-departure orientation.
  • The pre-departure orientation can include the following information:
    • Contractual obligations;
    • Terms and conditions of work (wages, benefits, work hours, living accommodations, list of legal deductions, etc.);
    • Receiving country’s legal requirements; and
    • Company policies and procedures, including:
    • Mechanisms for workers to report violations by company staff, informal recruiter, and middlemen to company’s policies and ethical standards; and
    • Non-reprisal policy for whistleblowers.
  • The company representative can advise workers not to sign any new contracts or supplemental contract clauses before departure, or upon arrival in the receiving country.
  • The company representative can provide workers with a checklist and samples of documents that they will be required to sign in order to process their work permits and clear other legal requirements so that workers are aware of what to expect.

Managing risk upon arrival at the host facility:

  • A company representative can meet workers upon their arrival in the receiving country and supervise post-arrival procedures.
  • The company can require that labor recruiters provide workers and the company with copies of all documents that workers must sign as part of arrival in the receiving country.
  • Upon arrival at the host facility, the company can conduct interviews with workers themselves, to inquire about the signing of any supplemental or substitute contracts. The company can also review all the documents that labor recruiters required workers to sign.
  • The company can have in place remediation procedures to respond to verified reports of the signing of supplemental or substitute contracts.

Throughout the recruiting and hiring process, companies can minimize the risk of forced labor associated with outsourcing recruitment and hiring by establishing and maintaining lines of direct communication with migrant workers.

Whether by providing workers information of what to expect throughout the pre-deployment, deployment, and orientation process; directly supervising the contract signing process; conducting validation interviews with workers on arrival at the facility; or incorporating any of the other suggestions above; companies can ensure that aspects of recruiting and hiring conform with their commitment to ending forced labor.

Tool 2: Monitoring the performance of labor recruiters – introduction and key issues of concern

Monitoring the performance of labor recruiters – introduction and key issues of concern

This tool provides an introduction to the rationale and purpose of the labor recruiter assessment, who should conduct it, and an overview of what information should be gathered. It also provides some detail as to the key areas of concern in a labor recruiter assessment.

This tool can be used in conjunction with sets of assessment questions for recruiters, workers, and documents review that are also found in this section of the Fair Hiring Toolkit.

Introduction

The purpose of a labor recruiter performance assessment is to verify whether or not the recruiter is performing according to the legal, ethical, and social responsibility requirements that the company has defined.

The labor recruiter performance assessment is a key element in the systems approach to social responsibility. Companies need visibility into how their labor recruiters operate, and a way to measure recruiter performance against social responsibility benchmarks. Performance assessment is especially critical where the protection of migrant workers against human trafficking and forced labor is concerned.

Having an assessment procedure in place gives companies an objective basis for management decisions, and helps protect against hidden abuses. It also drives labor recruiters toward performance effectiveness and continuous improvement, and toward meeting agreed upon goals related to business and social responsibility.

Verité recommends that a designated monitoring team, preferably from the human resources department, should perform the assessment. Members of the team should be knowledgeable in the company’s social responsibility program and trained to conduct a thorough, objective assessment. An independent third-party auditor may, alternatively, be engaged.

Individual companies should judge the best time for assessment based on the job cycle and other considerations. Where the outsourcing of recruitment and hiring is concerned, an assessment of the labor recruiter should be conducted soon after the migrant workers arrive at the facility. Assessments should also be conducted prior to contract renewal or in advance of a subsequent deployment of workers. Recruiters charged with aspects of on-site management should be assessed periodically. Where problems are found, follow up assessments to evaluate the success of any remediation procedures should be performed.

In essence, your assessment of the labor recruiter replicates the assessment process conducted of your facility by your internal auditors or by auditors contracted by customers. The actual performance assessment itself requires a process of triangulation – gathering and analyzing information from several sources.

Verité recommends gathering information from all of the following sources, where possible and relevant:

  • Agency management officers and personnel;
  • Migrant workers;
  • External stakeholders, such as government agencies accrediting labor recruiters and NGOs that work with trafficking victims;
  • Documents, including:
    • Business records – license, registration, etc.
    • Payroll records
    • Fees and payment records
    • Worker documentation
    • Discipline records
    • Grievance records
  • Actual observations during physical inspections;
    • Living and dining areas
    • Offices of the recruiter agency.
Key issues of concern

This tool can act as a guide for a host facility, recruiter or a third-party monitor in assessing functional areas of recruiter performance that can become sources of risk and noncompliance to standards on forced labor.

This tool introduces some key issues that should be included in the labor recruiter assessment, including:

  • Recruitment fees;
  • On-Boarding, orientation and training;
  • Wages and benefits;
  • Loans, deposits and deductions;
  • Dormitory and housing;
  • Grievance mechanisms / Worker feedback and communication;
  • Human treatment; and
  • Document retention.

For each topic area, the need and context for screening is explained, followed by a list of information to gather, and an articulation of key red flags and risks to look out for.

In addition to the issues articulated below, you should also follow up on the issues raised during the initial recruiter screening, to ensure that processes have not changed and no additional risks have been introduced. Because the issue of recruitment fees is perhaps the most critical, where the risk of trafficking and forced labor is concerned, it is repeated in both sections of this Toolkit.

Assessment area: Recruitment fees

Why are you assessing the labor recruiter’s policy and procedures on recruitment fees?
There is always a risk that a labor recruiter has charged jobseekers unauthorized or illegal fees, or has forced jobseekers to pay for services at amounts or interest rates that are excessive. In such cases, workers may be entering a situation of debt bondage or forced labor even before they set foot at your facility.

It is therefore important that you communicate clearly to your labor recruiter which fees can and cannot be charged jobseekers. Oversight must also be in place to ensure that the labor recruiter abides by these rules.

It is difficult to find hard evidence of violations to the “employers pay” standard, because such fee-charge violations rarely have a paper trail, or the paper trail is “doctored up” to hide illegal fee charges. Workers are often the only source of information regarding violations of this standard.

It is important that workers have a safe means for reporting violations directly to you, and that there is a credible and well-communicated procedure to investigate and respond to such reports. It is also important to levy penalties for violations of the employer pays policy, and to reimburse workers for any fee overcharges.

What information do you need to get?

  • A description of how the labor recruiter ensures compliance with the “employers pay” policy (e.g., the policy is included in work contracts, and sanctions are in place for noncompliance).
  • A list of expenses charged to jobseekers.
  • Mechanisms for jobseekers to report violations of company policy on recruitment fees.
  • Procedures for refunding fee overcharges.

What are some common risks and red flags?

  • There is no written commitment by the labor recruiter to adhere to the employers-pay policy.
  • There is no effective and safe procedure for workers to report ethical violations by internal staff or subcontractors of the employers-pay policy (e.g., workers are coached to lie about fees and expenses).
  • Jobseekers are charged a reservation fee and/or illegal deposits.
  • Illegal fees are charged to workers for processing of deployment documentation.
  • Jobseekers are charged excessive fees for mandatory skills training.
  • Jobseekers are charged fees beyond market rates for recruiter-owned or -operated accommodations during the pre-deployment period.
Assessment area: On-boarding, orientation and training

Why are you assessing the on-boarding, orientation, and training of migrant workers?
By assessing the on-boarding, orientation, and training of migrant workers, you will be able to understand how workers are informed about company policies and employment conditions; how the company ensures that workers clearly understand the policies and conditions; and whether these policies and conditions are explained to workers in a language that they understand.

You also need to check if the information provided to the workers during the on-boarding process are similar to the ones they receive prior to their start of employment in the facility. It is particularly important to know whether the terms and conditions that the workers agreed to are consistent with the ones offered to them at the start of their employment, and if these terms and conditions are consistent with actual practice.

Most workers will have signed a contract in their country of origin which was likely approved by their sending country authority. In most cases, these contracts are patterned after standard government contracts to expedite workers deployment abroad. However, upon arrival in the receiving country, some companies ask workers to sign supplemental agreements. These agreements often contain additional terms and conditions that can be unfavorable to workers but workers have little leverage to refuse to sign.

You also need to understand if the company also provides training programs for migrant workers and whether these are in place and are responsive to the needs of the company and the worker.

What information do you need to get?

  • On-Boarding Program:
    • Schedule
    • Areas covered
    • Documentation
    • Training Materials
  • Training Program:
    • Description of training programs provided by the recruiter or the facility
  • Skills improvement training program
  • Worker education and awareness training
  • Legally-mandated certification and skills programs
  • Language Training:
    • Hand-outs, worker’s copy of training materials
    • Skills assessment or skills gap assessment
  • Languages spoken by the workers
  • Training Fees:
    • Training costs
    • Who is responsible for training costs?
  • Trainers:
    • What qualifications do the trainers have?
    • Is training run by facility staff or is it outsourced?
  • Worker performance review practices and procedures;
  • Worker education and communication of performance review policy and procedures; and
  • Skill grade/classification of workers:
    • Organizational structure of facility
    • Pay structure.

What are some common risks and red flags?

  • There are no clear procedures for conducting on-boarding, orientation, and training of new hires;
  • Information provided to workers in on-boarding, orientation, and training practices are not consistent with company policies and procedures;
  • On-boarding, orientation, and training are conducted by recruiter or subcontractor, which may result in inconsistent messaging and insufficient information;
  • The on-boarding, orientation, and training are conducted in a language workers do not understand;
  • Workers are required to sign supplemental agreements during the on-boarding process.
  • Labor recruiters charge training fees to workers; or
  • A training bond or a condition for acquiring training that can result in workers being unable to terminate their contract freely (i.e., the worker was required to pay a bond upon hire, a portion of which was to pay for training).
Assessment area: Compensation and benefits

Why are you assessing your company’s compensation and benefits system?

The areas of compensation and benefits are closely tied to the risks of forced labor as workers can become involuntarily tied to the job due to a company’s or recruiter’s wage practices. Specific risks include underpayment of wages and unauthorized deductions and withholdings.

An assessment will help you determine if workers are paid the wage rate that was promised to them; if their wages are paid in the manner that the workers agreed to; and if workers are able to terminate their employment without sacrificing pay for hours previously worked. If deductions or withholdings are made from workers’ pay, an assessment will help you determine if this is a legally allowed practice and if it could result in forced labor.

What information do you need to get?

  • What is the legal minimum wage applicable to the facility?
  • What are the legal requirements on wages, including overtime pay, and benefits?
  • Pay practices:
    • How are wages paid?
    • What are the forms of wage payments (cash, deposit in worker’s bank account, etc.)?
    • Who has access to worker’s payroll bank account?
    • Pay cycle
  • Payroll period
  • Pay dates (important: determine number of days lapsed from last day of payroll period to pay day)
  • Pay structure:
    • What is the basic pay rate?
    • What are the overtime rates and other non-regular rates (holiday, rest day, etc.)?
    • Are any cash allowances given?
    • Are any productivity incentives awarded?
    • Are any bonuses given?
  • Pay deductions:
    • Are there any legally mandated deductions (e.g. social security premiums)?
    • Other deductions
    • Is any type of savings program implemented?
  • If yes, is this savings program implemented with or without the workers consent?
  • Benefits:
    • Are legally mandated benefits provided?
    • Which additional benefits are provided by the company?
  • Worker Education on Wages and Benefits:
    • How are workers educated on wage calculations?
    • How are workers educated on accessing benefits?

What are some common risks and red flags?

  • Underpayment or delayed payment of wages;
  • Labor recruiters have access to workers’ bank accounts, resulting in:
    • Forced savings
    • Illegal deductions
  • Workers are uninformed or misinformed about wage rates and deductions; or
  • No pay slips are provided.
Assessment area: Loans, deposits, and deductions

Why are you assessing fees, deposits, and deductions?
Excessive or illegal fees heighten workers’ vulnerability to forced labor. In order to have a clear picture of the vulnerability of your workforce to debt bondage and forced labor, you will want a full accounting of all fees, deposits and deductions to which migrant workers are subject.

To determine workers’ vulnerability it is important to understand the purpose, legality, and methods of levy for each of the fees, deposits, and deductions. In addition, you will need to know how workers repay these fees and whether repayment schemes restrict workers’ ability to terminate their employment.

What information do you need to get?

  • Fees and loans due to recruiters:
    • What is the schedule of payments?
    • What are the terms of repayment?
    • What is the fee schedule or line items for the fees?
    • What out-of-pocket payments to facility or to recruiter is the worker required to make?
  • Deposits, bonds and savings:
    • Security bond or deposit
    • Schedule of payments
    • Terms of payment
    • Terms for returning savings to workers
  • Recruiter- or company-managed savings:
    • Where the savings are kept or deposited. If bank account, who has access? Is it an ATM account or bankbook account? Who keeps the bank book?
    • Getting workers’ consent for savings
    • Do workers have access to their savings?
    • What are the terms for returning savings to workers
  • Deductions:
    • Penalties, fines
    • Meals
    • Housing
    • Uniforms
    • Tools
  • Documentation of payments:
    • Are all pay deductions recorded in pay slips? If final deductions are taken, are they recorded? (Net pay as reflected in pay slip versus pay deposited in worker’s account?)
    • Worker’s copy of proof of payment

What are some common risks and red flags?

  • Workers are charged recruiter fees for on-site management;
  • Workers are induced or encouraged to take loans from the recruiter or the facility at excessive interest rates or unreasonable terms of payment;
  • Workers are required to lodge deposits before taking up employment, and during employment;
  • Workers are ill-informed about the terms or the full amount of loans or deductions; or
  • Automatic deductions for loan payments are made against workers’ salary.
Assessment area: Dormitory and housing

Why are you assessing housing and dormitory?
You will want to know the full details of the housing provided to migrant workers, especially if these workers have no choice but to rely on the receiving-country labor recruiter or the host facility to secure their housing.

You will want to check if the housing provided to workers is comfortable, safe, and secure; and whether workers can freely enter or leave the premises. You need to check the house or dormitory rules and regulations, and whether there are unreasonable restrictions on workers’ freedom of movement. Inquiring about the security policy of the dormitory also alerts to safety risks. For example, pad-locking the gate from the inside after curfew hours with the key not readily accessible may result in workers getting trapped inside in case of fire.

You need to know who is managing the dormitory, what their specific functional tasks are, and if they are properly trained or equipped to fulfill the task. The related expenses, if the accommodations are not provided for free, should also be looked into. You need to know how much is charged, how payments are collected, and whether these are reasonable rates.

What information do you need to get?

  • Who manages the living quarters?;
  • Who bears the overhead expenses of the dormitory?;
  • Rules on leaving and entering the living quarters;
  • Other dormitory security procedures;
  • Rules while in the dormitory;
  • House-keeping practices; and
  • Emergency preparedness procedures.

 

What are some common risks and red flags?

  • Workers do not secure their housing accommodations themselves;
  • Recruiters or employers require workers to stay in recruiter-controlled or company-controlled housing facilities;
  • Curfews are implemented in the dormitories, and workers are unable to enter or leave the premises freely;
  • There are penalties for staying out, or for not returning to the dormitory or housing facility at a designated time;
  • Gates are closed at designated times; or
  • Security personnel are instructed to restrict workers from leaving or entering the dormitory or housing facility.
Assessment area: Discipline and termination

Why are you assessing the facility’s policy and practices on discipline and termination?

Disciplinary procedures – whether from the facility or recruiter — should be based on a clear set of rules and regulations that apply to all workers, regardless of employment status, or nationality and should include the right to due process. The process for termination should be legal and fair. Migrant workers should be able to refuse overtime, for example, without fearing early termination of their contract. Further, conditions for voluntary termination of the contract should not be so prohibitive that workers are unable to leave a job.

What information do you need to get?

  • What are standard rules and regulations, code of discipline?
    • Are there categories of misconduct?
  • Which misconduct is subject to a series of warnings? Which is subject to immediate termination?
  • Procedure for investigating reports of disciplinary violations:
    • How are workers notified of a disciplinary citation?
    • What processes are in place for workers to appeal or challenge a disciplinary action?
  • Description of disciplinary action taken by management:
    • Are escalating warnings issued to workers in response to behavior or performance issues?
  • Records kept on disciplinary proceedings;
  • Terms and conditions to terminate contract:
    • What penalties for not completing duration of contract?
  • Process for clearing resigned or terminated worker:
    • When do resigned or terminated worker get their last wages?
  • Training and education:
    • How are managers and supervisors trained on disciplinary policy?
    • How are workers trained on discipline policy?

What are some common risks and red flags?

  • Managers and supervisors are not adequately trained to implement the company’s policy on discipline;
  • Workers are not aware of the company’s policy on discipline;
  • Workers are not aware of performance objectives and the parameters against which they are evaluated;
  • Management does not document disciplinary proceedings;
  • Punitive deductions, unpaid work or forced overtime are a part of disciplinary measures; or
  • There are penalties for early contract termination.
Assessment area: Worker documentation

Why are you assessing the recruiter’s or host facility’s practices for storing and securing worker’s documents?
It is critical to determine if the company or recruiter holds workers’ original documents such as passports. Without access to such documents, workers are effectively bound to the worksite.

If passports are held, they should be submitted voluntarily and workers should have unencumbered access through a clear process. The key question to consider is whether practices around worker documentation retention create situations where the workers’ freedom of movement, or ability to terminate contract for reasonable cause, are restricted.

What information do you need to get?

  • Documentary requirements when applying for the job;
    • Which documents are workers required to show to the facility or recruiter: original, government-certified, or photocopy?
    • Which documents are workers required to submit to the facility or recruiter: original, government-certified, or photocopy?
  • Documentary requirements upon hire;
    • Which documents are workers required to submit to the facility or recruiter upon hire: original, government-certified, or photocopy?
    • Which original documents are held by the facility or recruiter? When are they handed over to the factory or recruiter? Where are documents stored? Who requests workers documents? What reason is given for the document retention? If used for processing of other legal papers, are they immediately returned to the worker after processing?
  • Procedure and practices for filing and keeping workers’ documents;
    • (If facility or recruiter keeps the worker’s travel and work documents) What facility- or recruiter-provided storage systems are provided to workers to keep their travel and work documents?
    • How can workers’ access their documents?
    • Do workers give their consent in submitting their documents?

What are some common risks and red flags?

  • Workers are required to surrender their passports and other key documents to the recruiter or employer;
  • Passports are taken without the workers’ full and informed consent;
  • Passports are taken from workers for safekeeping, and workers are made to sign a waiver indicating their consent;
  • Workers are required to post a bond or pay a deposit in order to retrieve passports.
  • Workers are misinformed about their right to secure their own documents; or
  • Workers are not provided means to secure their own documents.

The above information can be helpful to companies as they embark on a labor recruiter assessment. Companies should keep these key issues of concern at the forefront of the assessment process.

Tool 3: Conducting interviews with labor recruiters

Conducting interviews with labor recruiters

This tool is designed for use by company social auditors. It can be used by companies to improve their own audit protocols by expanding the audit interview process to include labor recruiters that provide workers to the company, or to a given company facility. The tool is oriented to help assess the recruitment and hiring practices of labor recruiters integrated into their supply chain. It is consistent with the code provisions and benchmarks provided in this toolkit, and complementary to the corresponding management and worker interview tools.

General profile of the labor recruiter and its operations

Auditors should start their labor recruiter audit by gathering basic information about the recruiter and its business. This can help to orient the rest of the interview with the labor recruiter and identify any potential issues that require follow-up or further discussion. It can also provide the auditor with an opportunity to explore the relationship between the labor recruiter and the companies and countries to which it sends labor.

  • What is the name of the labor recruiter? Its address? The names of its owners and their nationalities? And the names and addresses of other labor agencies operated by the owners?
  • Do the owners of the labor recruitment have any other businesses? What are the names, locations and nature of those businesses?
  • How many years has the labor recruiter been in the business of supplying manpower?
  • What are the main services that the labor recruiter provides?
  • What types of migrant workers does the labor recruiter provide? Do these include professional, skilled, semi-skilled or low-skilled migrant workers? In what industry or industries does the labor recruiter place migrant workers? What countries does the labor recruiter supply labor to?
  • Does the labor recruiter work with local partners in each country where it provides labor? Who are the local partners the labor recruiter works with for the facility in question? What are their names, addresses and complete contact information?
  • Has the labor recruiter ever paid money to a facility to “win” a contract for labor provision?
  • How many years has the labor recruiter provided migrant workers to this particular facility?
  • Does the contract signed between the labor recruiter and the facility contain clauses on social compliance, such as measures to prevent forced labor and human trafficking?
General profile of the migrant workers placed with the facility

It is important for the auditor to gain close insight into the migrant workers that are placed by the labor recruiter. This can be done by speaking with the labor recruiter directly, as well as by speaking with the recruiter’s sub-agents and local partners.

However, it is essential to cross-check information gained from recruiters and subagents with interviews with representative migrant workers at each facility. This triangulation will help the auditor identify each of the migrant workers placed by the labor recruiter, their national and personal details, and basic information about their employment contract and relationship.

  • How many migrant workers has the labor recruiter placed with the facility?
  • What are the countries of origin of the migrant workers placed with the facility? How many workers are rom each country? What is the duration of contracts?
  • Does the labor recruiter have a complete list of migrant workers placed with the facility, including the following information:
      • Names;
      • Workstation department or shift;
      • Date of hire;
      • Home country address of workers and phone numbers; and
      • Emergency contact information.
Legal history and social compliance

In addition to gathering basic information about the labor recruiter’s business and the migrant workers it has placed, it will be important for the auditor to assess the legal and social compliance of the labor recruiter, as well as its systems for staying up to date on new regulations or regulatory changes that affect businesses sending workers overseas.

Discussions can focus on public licensing or certification for labor recruiters, company policies on social responsibility and the procedures or overall management system the labor recruiter has in place to ensure protection of migrant workers.

  • Is the labor recruiter legally registered and licensed to operate in each country from which it sends workers?
  • What aspects of the labor recruiter’s business are audited or inspected by local government authorities? How often does this audit or inspection occur?
  • What system does the labor recruiter have in place to ensure that it stays up-to-date on new legal and regulatory developments concerning migrant workers in the country or countries where it places workers? Does the labor recruiter have an implementing structure, an accountable officer, and clear procedures to guarantee that its policies are compliant with relevant laws and regulations?
  • Has the labor recruiter ever been cited or penalized by local or foreign authorities for any reason relating to its practices within the last five years? If yes, have these conditions been corrected to the satisfaction of the inspecting/citing authority?
  • Are there any civil or criminal legal actions against the owner(s) pending? If yes, what are the details of this action?
  • Does the labor recruiter have a code of conduct that explicitly prohibits forced labor and human trafficking, and sets out protective measures for migrant workers?
Recruitment and hiring process

A focus on the details of the recruitment and hiring process used by the labor recruiter will illuminate any potential risks that may face migrant workers placed by the labor recruiter. Auditors should seek to understand the full scope of this process, including the recruitment, selection, contracting, hiring and transportation stages.

They should also be aware of the actors involved at each stage, for example whether or not sub-agents are used to recruit migrant workers from further afield. This stage of the labor recruiter interview also opens the door to discussing transparency in recruitment and the information that is provided to migrant workers in the pre-departure phase.

  • What is the step-by-step process used by the labor recruiter for recruiting migrant workers, including information about recruitment and applicant selection; documents processing; the contracting process and signature of employment contracts; recruitment fees; and pre-departure briefing?
  • Does the labor recruiter have measures in place to ensure that its representatives and sub-agents working on its behalf provide migrant workers with true and accurate details about working, employment and living conditions at the time of recruitment?
  • Does the labor recruiter provide pre-departure orientation and training to migrant workers in order to review:
      • Contractual obligations;
      • Employee and employer rights and obligations;
      • Terms and conditions of work;
      • Living conditions;
      • Company policies; and
      • Grievance mechanisms in place for workers?
Recruitment fees and expenses

The fees and expenses charged to migrant workers by labor recruiters that recruit, hire, send and receive them overseas can create grave vulnerability to debt bondage and forced labor. Auditors will need to probe for this carefully and with a variety of questions and interview techniques.

Fees can be charged by the labor recruiter, its sub-agents or local partners. Fees might be deducted from migrant workers’ wages or paid up-front by the migrant worker. The facility may or may not know about the extent of the fees that have been charged.

It is the auditor’s responsibility to uncover this complexity and to cross-check the information with statements made by facility managers and migrant workers.

The following issues should be included in the audit of a facility that is host to migrant workers:

  • Do migrant workers pay a fee in their country of origin or the receiving country for labor-recruitment services? How much do they have to pay, and what do these fees cover?
      • Reservation or Commitment Fee: Is this amount returned or refunded to the worker if he or she is not selected for employment?
      • Service, Placement or Recruitment fee: Is this fee paid up-front and directly to the labor recruiter, or is it deducted from the worker’s salary at the facility?
      • Processing of Travel Documents, Visas and Work Permits: Is a separate fee charged for this or is this included in the recruitment fee?
      • Registration for Skills Testing or Certification: Is this charge included in the recruitment fee or do workers pay for this directly to the government labor recruiter providing the service?
      • Mandatory Physical, Health or Medical Tests Required by Sending and Receiving Country
      • Language Training or Pre-departure Orientation or Seminar
      • Air Travel or Other Transportation Costs: Are such costs included in the recruitment fee, paid by the worker up-front, or paid by the facility?
      • Surety Bond or Deposit
      • Other Fees
        • Does the labor recruiter provide workers with a written itemized breakdown of the fees and expenses they pay?
        • Upon arrival at the place of employment, are workers charged further fees by the labor recruiter or its local partners, for example a labor recruitment fee or surety bond that is paid on-site?
        • Does the labor recruiter or facility deduct a portion of the recruitment fee from migrant workers’ salaries? If yes, how much is deducted per month, and for how many months?
        • Are migrant workers required to pay a deposit to hold a contract? How much is the deposit, and is it paid to the labor recruiter, facility or both? Under what circumstances and how do workers get their deposit back?
Employment contracts

Auditors will also want to discuss the contracting process and the nature of employment contracts with labor recruiters. The key question here concerns contract substitution, a process whereby an original contract that has been signed by a migrant worker is replaced by another – or supplemented with additional pages – that worsen the conditions agreed to. However, there are other issues at play that the auditor should also seek to address. These include how and where the contract was signed, and the language in which it was written. To verify the information provided by recruiters, the auditor may wish to review copies of employment contracts provided to migrant workers during the document review process.

  • Who are migrant workers under contract to: the labor recruiter, the facility, or both?
  • Are employment contracts with migrant workers signed in the country of origin, upon arrival at the location of employment, or both?
  • How does the labor recruiter guarantee that migrant workers understand the contents of the employment contract before they sign it?
  • Is the contract written in a language that migrant workers understand?
  • Are migrant workers given a copy of their signed contract?
  • What measures does the labor recruiter have in place to ensure that its representatives and sub-agents do not misrepresent the nature of the job offered at the time of recruitment or hiring?
  • Does the labor recruiter have measures in place to ensure that the original contracts signed by migrant workers are not amended in any way by the facility, representatives of the labor recruiter itself, or its local partner in the receiving country, unless to improve upon the migrant worker’s originally anticipated employment conditions? Are such changes made only with the full knowledge and consent of the migrant worker concerned?
Document retention

Auditors should also discuss the issue of document retention with labor recruiters. This will be particularly important in cases where labor recruiters act as the on-site managers of the workers they place and where they are responsible for general human resources management. It will also be important in those cases where migrant workers reside in labor recruiter-operated dormitories.

If the facility operates in a jurisdiction where employers are required to maintain migrant workers’ travel documents, the auditor will also want to discuss any mechanisms the labor recruiter has in place to allow workers free access to their documents.

  • Does the labor recruiter, its local partner or facility ever hold migrant workers’ passports or other valuable items (e.g. bank books or ATM cards)? If yes, is this legally required?
  • If the labor recruiter, its local partner or facility holds passports for legal reasons or by request of the worker:
      • Do workers have unrestricted access to them at any time?
      • Are workers provided with an exact copy of the documentation when it is not in their possession?
      • Has the labor recruiter, local partner or facility nominated a responsible person to ensure that workers have free access to their documents upon demand?
      • Does the labor recruiter notify workers of these conditions and procedures in advance?
Deposits

Security deposits are sometimes charged by labor recruiters to prevent migrant workers from leaving the employer and finding a new job. They are frequently referred to as “runaway insurance”.

It is important for the auditor to review this issue to determine whether such a charge has been made, who made it, and the conditions under which workers get it back.

  • Are migrant workers ever required to pay a deposit or bond of any kind to the labor recruiter, its local partner or the facility during the recruitment process or at any other time during employment?
  • How much is this deposit or bond? When and how is this money returned to workers?
Wages and wage deductions

The auditor should discuss wage payment practices and deductions with labor recruiters when they act as the formal employer of migrant workers at the facility. If this is not the case, the labor recruiter will have little to provide at this stage of the interview.

Auditors should also speak with labor recruiters about any advances or loans they provide to workers, for example to cover recruitment fees or expenses. This should address loan conditions, interest rates and financing periods to ensure worker consent, transparency and ethical behavior.

  • Does the labor recruiter, its local partner or facility pay migrant workers?
  • If the labor recruiter or its partner pays workers, when and at what frequency are they paid?
  • Are wage payments ever delayed or withheld? If yes, under what circumstances has this occurred?
  • Are migrant workers given a pay slip or wage statement on payday? Does this pay slip clearly indicate wage calculations and any deductions made from their salary?
  • How does the labor recruiter ensure that migrant workers are paid at the same basic rate as local workers?
  • Does the labor recruiter make any deductions or withholdings from workers’ pay? If yes, how much is deducted, and what do these deductions cover? Are these deductions stipulated in workers’ contracts? Are they made with workers’ knowledge and consent?
  • Does the labor recruiter or its local partner deduct for meals or housing? If yes, do migrant workers have the option to withdraw from food and housing provisions?
  • Does the labor recruiter ever provide loans to migrant workers for recruitment fees? What amount is provided? What is the interest rate on the loan and the financing period? Are loan agreements or advances concluded with the full knowledge and consent of workers?
  • If migrant workers borrow money from the labor recruiter , how do they pay the loan back? Is it paid in cash to the labor recruiter or facility, deducted from paychecks, or another method? How much do workers pay monthly, and how many months do they have to pay for the loan?
  • Does the labor recruiter, local partner or facility deduct any amount from workers’ salaries as part of a savings program?
    • How much is deducted? Is this deduction voluntary? Are savings kept at a bank account in the country of origin or the receiving country?
    • Do workers have full control and access to their savings at all times? Does anyone else have access to workers’ savings or authority to withdraw money?
    • When do workers get their savings back?
Compulsory or involuntary overtime

A key form of forced labor that all workers, including migrant workers, can face is compulsory or involuntary overtime beyond the limits established by national law.

If the labor recruiter is responsible for the general management of the workers it places with the facility (including hours of work and overtime), the auditor should discuss this in order to determine what labor recruiter policies and procedures are and the measures the labor recruiter has in place to guarantee overtime is always voluntary.

  • Are workers ever required by the labor recruiter, its local partner or the facility to work more overtime than allowed by national law? What are the circumstances of such requirements?
  • When overtime is necessary, are workers free to refuse it? Does the labor recruiter or facility ever punish workers for refusing to work overtime?
Freedom of movement and personal freedom

Restrictions on the freedom of movement and personal freedom of migrant workers can occur in the workplace and in labor recruiter- or employer-operated residences. When speaking with labor recruiters about this, auditors should determine whether such restrictions exist and, if so, why and can they be considered reasonable? Auditors should also discuss in detail any labor recruiter-operated dormitories, if they exist, and the living conditions that face workers there.

  • Does the labor recruiter or its local partner place any restrictions on migrant workers’ freedom of movement in the workplace? What are these restrictions and the reasons for them?
  • Does the labor recruiter provide residence to migrant workers as part of its service? What is the name and address of the dormitory or hostel?
  • Are migrant workers required to live in such facilities or are they free to reside elsewhere?
  • Do migrant workers pay for this accommodation? How much do they pay per month? Is the amount they pay commensurate to or lower than market rates? How do workers pay for this accommodation?
  • Are there any restrictions on movement for migrant workers within such accommodation or outside working hours? Does the residence have a curfew? Are workers allowed to receive guests or visitors?
Workplace discipline

Disciplinary procedures in the workplace will only be the responsibility of labor recruiters if they manage workers directly. If this is the case, auditors should assess whether monetary fines are ever levied for workplace misconduct and, if so, under what circumstances; and whether the labor recruiters’ sanctions ever result in compulsory labor.

Information gathered at this stage of the labor recruiter interview can be cross checked with disciplinary records and statements from workers.

  • Who is responsible for workplace discipline in the facility? Are there any parties aside from the facility involved in disciplining workers, for example the labor recruiter or its local partner, or a dormitory representative?
  • What steps are taken for disciplining a worker? Are monetary fines ever levied for misconduct? If so, under what circumstances, for what types of offense, how much is charged, and how are these payments made?
  • Do disciplinary sanctions ever involve compulsory work? If they do, under what circumstances does this occur?
  • What types of misconduct carry the penalty of dismissal and repatriation? Does the labor recruiter have a clear process that includes credible investigation before workers are terminated and repatriated?
  • Are there any penalties for migrant workers who quit before their contract expires? In such cases, who pays for their return airfare or transportation?
  • Are there any penalties for migrant workers who are terminated or fired before their contract expires? In such cases, who pays for their return airfare or transportation?
Threat of violence and intimidation

Threats of violence, harassment and intimidation of any kind should be strictly prohibited by the labor recruiter. Auditors can use this opportunity to discuss company policy, awareness raising efforts, sensitization and training for labor recruiters and sub-agents, and any specific procedures the labor recruiter has in place to address instances of such abuse if they occur.

  • Does the labor recruiter have a clear policy that strictly prohibits the following:
      • Verbal abuse, harassment or intimidation?
      • Physical abuse, corporal punishment?
      • Sexual harassment or abuse?
  • Have there been any instances of such abuse involving a labor recruiter representative or local partner?
Grievance procedure

An effective and trustworthy grievance procedure or complaints mechanism for migrant workers is an important part of taking preventive and corrective action against abuse in the workplace and in the recruitment and hiring process.

Auditors should seek to assess the labor recruiter’s procedure for receiving complaints and determine whether workers are free to raise the issues they have, whether these pertain to the employment practices of the facility or conditions related to the labor recruiter, its sub-agents or local partners.

  • Has the labor recruiter nominated a representative to receive and process complaints from migrant workers? Does this representative speak the language(s) of migrant workers?
  • Does the labor recruiter have an assigned unit or staff representative to receive and process workers’ reports of harassment or abuse?
  • What are the labor recruiter’s procedures for dealing with harassment and abuse? Do these include reporting, investigation, follow-up and sanctions?
Termination of employment

In discussing termination of employment with labor recruiters, auditors may wish to assess resignation procedures, notice periods and policies regarding repatriation under such circumstances. The key in this case is to ensure that workers suffer no penalty or threat of penalty in resigning or terminating their contract, as long as they do so with reasonable notice as required by law.

  • What is the labor recruiter’s policy and procedure for resignation? Are migrant workers free to resign at any time, given reasonable notice?
  • Are there any penalties for migrant workers who terminate their contract before its end-date? What are those penalties?
  • Does the labor recruiter or its local partner use any deceptive or coercive means to restrict workers’ freedom to terminate employment?

Tool 4: Conducting interviews with migrant workers

Conducting interviews with migrant workers

This tool is designed as a set of sample interview topics for brands and social auditors to consider when conducting targeted migrant and foreign contract worker interviews. It is consistent with the code provisions and benchmarks provided in Section 1 of the Brand Toolkit and complementary to the management and labor recruiter interview topics provided elsewhere in this section.

Brands can use this tool to help shape their own worker interview questionnaires, thus improving their auditors’ ability to identify possible cases of abuse or recruiter-induced forced labor.

Recruitment and hiring

There are many stages in the recruitment and hiring process for migrant workers, and there may be many labor recruiters involved along the way. It is important for the auditor to discuss the recruitment and hiring process with migrant workers in order to better understand the process, actors, and circumstances involved in placing them at the facility. With every new recruiter’s involvement, another door is opened to the potential for abuse and malpractice.

It is also important to discuss labor recruiter and facility orientation procedures to determine whether migrant workers are aware of key policies and procedures in the workplace and terms and condition of work before they start their job.

Here are some of the issues an auditor may wish to discuss with migrant workers:

  • How many labor recruiters were involved in migrant workers’ recruitment in the country of origin?
  • What is the name and address of each labor recruiter or agency involved in the country of origin?
  • At the time of recruitment, was the worker given accurate details about the job location, contract duration, anticipated earnings, working and employment conditions on the job, and living conditions?
  • Did the worker participate in a pre-departure orientation?
  • If yes, what did that orientation include? Did it review:
      • Contractual obligations;
      • Terms and conditions of work;
      • Rights and responsibilities on the job, and those of your employer;
      • Living conditions;
      • Company policies; and/or
      • Grievance mechanisms that are in place for the worker on the job?
  • When the worker arrived in the destination country, did s/he:
      • Receive accommodation;
      • Receive an orientation session at the facility;
      • Undergo a medical examination; and/or
      • Open a bank account?
  • Did the worker receive orientation on the facility’s personnel policies? If yes, what was addressed during the orientation?
      • Personnel policies;
      • Regular wages and hours;
      • Vacations, sick and personal leave;
      • Overtime hours and rates;
      • Grievance procedures;
      • Health and safety policies;
      • Benefits and deductions;
      • Discipline and termination; and/or
      • Harassment and abuse.
  • Was the worker given a copy of the facility personnel policies or employee handbook? If yes, was this handbook written in a language that the worker understands?
  • Are the facility policies, procedures and work instructions communicated to workers in language they understand?
Recruitment fees and expenses

In assessing risk factors for debt bondage of migrant workers, it is essential to obtain a thorough picture of all expenses incurred by the migrant worker in obtaining the job overseas, as well as the manner in which the worker financed these fees. Fees are referred to in various ways and serve various functions.

The questions below will help you determine the full array of fees and expenses that migrant workers may have incurred in obtaining their job abroad, and the terms of any financing arrangements into with the worker may have entered.

The auditor should be sure that the following issues are included in any assessment:

  • Did the worker pay a service, placement, or recruitment fee to the recruitment agency in the sending country? If yes, how much was this fee? Did the worker pay a fee to an individual or sub-agent of the agency? If yes, how much was this fee?
  • Did the worker pay a reservation or commitment fee? If yes, how much was this fee? Is the amount refundable and, if yes, when is it refunded? If no, is the amount deducted from the total cost of the recruitment fees charged to the worker?
  • Did the recruitment agency provide the worker with a written itemized breakdown of the fees and expenses paid? If yes, what did the fees and expenses cover? How much was each fee or expense?
  • Who arranged for the processing of the worker’s required travel documents, such as work permit, visa, and passport? Was a fee charged for this service? If so, how much was this fee?
  • Did the worker pay fees for any of the following:
      • To register for a skills test or certification;
      • For language-training;
      • For medical or physical examination; and/or
      • For a pre-departure briefing?
  • How much did the worker pay for travel costs (airfare or another mode of travel)? Was this cost included in service or recruitment fees charged by the labor recruiter, or paid directly to a travel agency? Will return travel be paid by the employer or worker?
  • Was the worker required to pay a labor recruiter’s fee in the receiving country? If yes, how much was this fee? Was it paid up-front, or is it deducted from the worker’s salary?
  • Did the worker pay a deposit or bond of any kind, such as a surety bond? If yes, how much did the worker pay? What was this deposit or bond for? To whom was it paid?
  • Was the worker required to pay any sort of levy or tax to obtain the job? If yes, how much and to whom?
  • Were any fees, expenses, levies, deposits or bonds charged to the worker paid up-front, or are these deducted from his or her pay?
  • Did the worker have to borrow any money to pay for recruitment fees and expenses? If yes, how much was borrowed? From whom did the money come? Is there an associated interest rate and, if yes, how much is this? How does the worker repay the loan? What is the repayment schedule?
Contracts of employment

Formal and signed contracts of employment between the worker and facility or labor recruiter are legally binding agreements and a pre-requisite to providing employment protection to migrant or foreign contract workers. They are a cornerstone to monitoring social compliance and essential to clarifying the employment relationship and its terms and conditions.

For auditors, when assessing the recruitment and hiring of migrant workers, it is necessary not only to examine copies of these contracts to determine wage levels and other entitlements under the contract; it is also necessary to understand how and when the contract was signed, and under what conditions.

Consider discussing these issues with workers as an important part of your own worker interviews:

  • Did the worker sign an employment contract for the job? If yes, with whom was the contract signed: the facility or the labor recruiter?
  • Were the terms of the employment contract explained to the worker? If yes, who explained these terms to the worker? Does the worker fully understand the terms and conditions of the contract? If no, what parts are not understood?
  • When and where was the contract signed (e.g. prior to departure or upon arrival at the facility)?
  • In what language is the contract written and does the worker understand that language?
  • Was the worker given a copy of the contract to review prior to signing? Once signed, was he or she given a copy of the signed contract?
  • Did the worker have to sign two sets of employment contracts? If yes, were both sets the same in content and, if no, how were they different? Were these differences explained to the worker, and what was the reason given?
  • Are the details contained in the worker’s employment contract consistent with the details that were provided at the time of recruitment? If not, what has changed?
  • Are the actual terms and conditions on the job consistent with those that are described in the employment contract?
  • Was the worker’s original contract amended in any way following signature? If yes, do these amendments improve or worsen the worker’s employment conditions? Were these amendments made with the worker’s prior knowledge and informed, written consent?
  • Was the worker pressured or threatened in any way into accepting the job or any of the terms included in the employment contract?
  • Under what conditions can the contract be renewed?
Document retention

Confiscating or withholding personal documents can be a form of coercion that leaves migrant workers highly vulnerable to forced labor. When labor recruiters or brand or supplier facilities take away workers’ passports, residency or work permits, personal identity documents, or even ATM cards, this not only limits their freedom of movement and personal freedom; it effectively binds them to that employer or labor recruiter, restricting their ability to terminate employment or leave the job without the threat of losing this valuable property.

In many cases, it also means that the worker is not able to take up a new job, access social benefits to which they may be entitled and is vulnerable to deportation or detention by immigration authorities.

It is essential that auditor address these issues in their interviews with migrant workers:

  • Did the worker submit any original copies of government-issued identification, passports or work permits to the facility or receiving country labor recruiter? If yes, what was submitted (e.g., passport, residency permit, work authorization, identity documents, ATM or bank card, or other travel documents, for example the return portion of travel tickets)? What was the reason for this?
  • Are personal documents withheld due to legal requirements or did the worker request the facility to hold them? If yes:
      • Do workers have free and unhindered access to their documents?
      • What is the procedure for getting the documents back?
      • Are workers given an exact copy of the document when it is not in their possession?
      • Does the facility or labor recruiter nominate a responsible person to ensure that workers have free access to their documents upon demand?
      • Were workers given advanced notice of these requirements and procedures?
      • Have workers ever encountered lengthy or otherwise burdensome prerequisites when accessing their passport or other personal documentation?
  • Do workers have free access to a locked, secure storage space for their personal documents and valuables?
Deposits

So-called “security deposits” or “runaway insurance” are sometimes used by labor recruiters or employers to limit migrant workers’ ability to terminate employment and find a new job. This “fee” is typically paid up-front at the time of recruitment, and is kept until the contract has been fulfilled. If the worker terminates their employment prior to the contract’s end date, they run the risk of losing their money. Auditors should be aware of this abuse, and discuss it directly with workers.

Here are some of the issues an auditor may want to consider:

  • Did the worker pay a deposit or bond of any kind during the recruitment process?
  • Has a fee or bond been paid by workers at any other time during the employment relationship?
  • If yes is answered to either of these questions:
      • How much was the fee paid?
      • To whom was it paid?
      • When does the worker expect to get the deposit back?
      • What are the conditions under which the amount is returned?
Wages and wage deductions

Auditing wage and salary payments can be one of the most complex and challenging aspects of a social audit. This is no less the case when assessing wage conditions facing migrant and foreign contract workers who are highly vulnerable to debt bondage resulting from withheld wage payments, excessive deductions from wages, or fraudulent practices with regard to advances and loans provided by the facility or labor recruiter.

To address this complexity and establish a clear picture of migrant worker wage conditions, auditors may wish to consider discussing the following with workers:

  • Who pays migrant workers’ wages? Are they paid by the facility or the labor recruiter?
  • How are workers paid (e.g. hourly, daily or piece rate; in cash, check or direct deposit), and are they paid at the same rate as local workers?
  • Do workers receive their pay on time? Have wage payments, or any portion of wages, ever been delayed or withheld? If yes, what were the circumstances of this?
  • Do workers receive a pay slip or wage statement on payday? If yes, is this pay slip in a language they understand, and does it clearly indicate wage calculations and any deductions that are made from the worker’s salary?
  • Are any deductions made from the worker’s salary? If yes, how much is deducted and what for (e.g. meals, transportation, lodging, utilities, uniform, tools, other)? Are these deductions made with the worker’s knowledge and consent? Are workers requested to sign a document to authorize the deduction(s)?
  • Do workers ever receive wages in the form of non-cash or “in-kind” payments? If yes, what percentage of the wage has been paid in this way?
  • Has the worker ever received an advance on his or her wages or a loan from the facility or labor recruiter? If yes, what were the terms of this loan, including the interest rate and financing period? Have the terms of the loan ever been changed without the worker’s consent?
  • Does the worker participate in a savings program sponsored by the labor recruiter or facility? If yes, is this program voluntary? Do workers sign a written consent form to authorize deductions for voluntary savings? Where are workers’ savings kept? If savings are kept in a bank, do workers have free access to their bank account? When do workers get their savings back? Have workers experienced any difficulties in accessing their savings or getting them back?
  • Is there anyone else, apart from the worker, who has access to his or her bank account, for example through an ATM card or power of attorney? Has the worker ever authorized another person to access their account to make a withdrawal? If yes, who else has such access?
  • Does the facility or labor recruiter limit in any way the worker’s freedom to dispose of their wages as they see fit?
Compulsory or involuntary overtime

Compulsory overtime is a key form of forced labor that all workers can be subject to, not only migrant and foreign contract workers. However, the latter may be at greater risk of this abuse because of their heightened vulnerability, and the many pressure points that brand or supplier facilities, or labor recruiters, may have to exploit their vulnerability.

Addressing this issue should be central to all worker interviews; it is even more important for discussions with migrant workers.

  • How often do workers have to work overtime, and for what reasons?
  • Is overtime at the facility always voluntary? If no, what are the circumstances involving involuntary overtime?
  • Are workers free to refuse overtime without threat or fear of punishment? What happens if a worker refuses to work overtime?
  • Are workers given advance notice by the facility or labor recruiter when overtime is required?
Freedom of movement and personal freedom

Restrictions on freedom of movement for migrant workers can exist in the workplace or in dormitories where they live.

They can result from facility or labor recruiter policies; rules and regulations governing worker residences; the legal, regulatory or security environment; cultural norms or considerations; active threats, intimidation and harassment by a manager, labor recruiter, or security guard; and deceptive or hidden forms of coercion such as passport confiscation, which is addressed above.

Some forms of restriction can be considered reasonable, such as policies relating to workplace discipline; while others are wholly unreasonable and highly abusive.

To make sense of this complex issue, here are some of the topics that auditors may wish to discuss with workers concerning their freedom of movement and personal freedom:

  • Are there any restrictions on migrant workers’ freedom of movement in the workplace during working hours? If yes, what are these restrictions? Are they reasonable? Do security personnel ever restrict workers’ freedom of movement in the workplace for reasons other than workplace security?
  • Are workers ever restricted from or monitored when using the toilet facilities? Are they free to get drinking water whenever they wish?
  • Are workers free to perform religious obligations without restriction?
  • Are workers free to leave the workplace immediately after their shift? Are they able to get permission to leave the factory during work hours under reasonable circumstances? What is the procedure for requesting this permission (e.g. how many signatures are required to request a gate pass)?
  • If workers live in a dormitory provided or operated by the facility or labor recruiter, are they required to live there as a condition of recruitment or continued employment? Are workers free to leave the dormitory and reside elsewhere? Are they free to come and go as they please during non-working hours? If not, what are the restrictions on freedom of movement, and are they reasonable? Does the dormitory have a curfew? Are there any dormitory rules and regulations that unreasonably restrict workers’ personal freedom?
Workplace discipline

Disciplinary measures and, in particular, the penalty of dismissal and repatriation can be abused to threaten, take advantage of, and apply pressure on migrant workers. While some measures may be justified in reacting to misconduct, disciplinary measure should not result in compulsory labor or an obligation to work.

It is important for the auditor to discuss disciplinary measures and determine that they are fair, objective, transparent, and communicated to workers in language they understand.

Here are some of the issues auditors may wish to discuss:

  • What steps are taken for disciplining a worker?
  • What types of misconduct carry the penalty of dismissal and repatriation?
  • Is there a clear process that includes investigation before workers are terminated and repatriated?
  • Do workers feel that disciplinary practices are fair?
  • Are workers subject to punitive fines or deductions as a disciplinary measure?
  • Do deductions for tardiness or time missed ever exceed the wage equivalent of the time missed?
  • Do disciplinary measures ever involve forced or compulsory work as punishment for an workplace infraction?
  • Are workers ever forced to sign a letter of resignation?
Threat of violence and intimidation

Harassment, intimidation, and threats or use of violence can take many forms in the workplace or in facility – or labor recruiter-operated residences. They can be perpetrated by a supervisor, facility manager, recruiter representative, dormitory manager, security guard, or even a fellow worker at almost any stage of the employment relationship, including recruitment and hiring.

The aim may be to frighten the worker or pressure them into accepting certain terms and conditions of employment or living conditions; or it may be to force them to work overtime or perform hazardous or life-threatening tasks. Whatever the case, there should be a zero tolerance policy in place to prevent such behavior, and migrant workers are a key potential source of information in determining facility or recruiter compliance with that policy.

Auditors should consider discussing the following:

  • Have workers ever been subject to or witnessed verbal abuse, psychological harassment, intimidation, physical abuse, or sexual harassment? If yes, what happened, when and where did it happen, and who was involved? Is this abuse on-going? Was the incident(s) reported to facility management or the labor recruiter? What actions were taken to correct the abuse?
  • Are workers aware of factory policies and procedures for dealing with harassment and abuse complaints (e.g. reporting, investigation, follow-up, and sanctions)?
  • Does the facility conduct regular anti-harassment and abuse training for workers?
Worker communication and grievance procedure

An effective complaints mechanism and grievance procedure in the workplace that allows migrant workers to confidentially raise issues about labor recruiter or facility practices or the conditions they face in the workplace or dormitory is an important element in taking corrective action against abuse and exploitation.

It is a key first step in remediating existing problems, and doing so at the level where problems exist. However, in many cases, grievance procedures may not even exists; they may not be effective, trusted or used by migrant workers; or they may only apply to the facility and not to labor recruiters, where significant forms of abuse may occur. In this case, it is important for auditors to investigate fully, and discuss with workers the options they have available to them to raise questions and complaints.

  • How are issues or complaints from migrant workers brought to the attention of the facility or labor recruiter?
  • Is there a representative who receives and processes complaints? If yes, what is the position of this representative? Does this person speak the language of migrant workers? Are workers comfortable bringing their complaints to this person?
  • Is there a mechanism in place for workers to raise a grievance with someone other than their direct supervisor?
  • Is there an anonymous procedure to report grievances? What means are in place to protect the identity of the worker reporting the grievance?
  • Are the responses to grievances and actions taken to address them communicated to workers? If so, what is the main method of communication?
  • Do workers feel that complaints and grievance procedures are effective?
  • Are workers free to join or form a trade union? Has the facility done anything, including interference or penalties, to prevent workers from joining or forming a union?
Termination of employment

The ability of migrant workers to terminate employment at any time without penalty and with reasonable notice is central to ensuring that they work in a free employment relationship. In speaking with migrants, auditors may wish to probe this issue, and seek to identify whether any limitations exist that prevent workers from terminating their contracts before they are finished.

  • Are migrant workers free to resign from their position without penalty prior to the end of their contract? If no, what are the penalties they face? Who pays for migrant workers’ return travel if they quit before their contract expires?
  • What is the required notice period for terminating a contract?
  • If the worker participates in a voluntary savings program facilitated by the employer or labor recruiter, does he or she have free access to all savings and monies owed at the time of contract termination?

Tool 5: Conducting a review of documentation

Conducting a review of documentation

A review of company and worker documentation is a core element of social auditing. Alongside interviews with management and workers, this review helps auditors to gain a clearer picture of working and employment conditions at the audited facility, shedding light on issues such as wage levels and deductions, working hours and any existing complaints and grievances raised by workers.

Auditors typically review a variety of documents. These include wage slips, company policies and procedures, contracts of employment, and all other files relevant to monitoring employment conditions face by workers in the facility. In auditing fair hiring and recruitment, this review is both deepened and extended.

It is deepened to examine in greater detail the recruitment and employment conditions facing migrant workers; and it is extended beyond the facility and its immediate workforce, to include an essential review of labor recruiter operations and the workers that are recruited and managed by them. A fair hiring audit is a more thorough and comprehensive audit.

There are many steps that brands can take to integrate fair hiring principles into this stage of their audits. Below you will find a list of the documents you may want to review, along with an explanation of what to look for. This guidance is divided into two sections: first, the facility (brand or supplier) documents you can review; and second, the labor recruiter documents that are also important to examine.

Documents from the facility

1. A copy of the signed contract between the facility and each labor recruiter that provides migrant workers to the facility.

Review the contract to ensure that obligations are specified on the following:

  • Services provided by the labor recruiter;
  • Expenses and fees covered by the facility and labor recruiter;
  • Recruitment fees;
  • Prohibition of forced labor and human trafficking;
  • Sanctions for non-compliance with contract terms relating to labor and human rights; and an
  • Itemized account and manner of deductions made by either the facility or the labor recruiter.

2. A complete list of all migrant and foreign contract workers in the facility.

When you review this list, make sure it includes the following information:

  • Full names and employee identification numbers of each worker;
  • Workstation department and work schedule and shift;
  • Date of hire;
  • Name of labor recruiter (both sending and receiving countries);
  • Home country address and contact information; and
  • Emergency contact information

3. A complete list of all labor recruiters providing workers to the facility, and other documentation.

For each recruiter, be sure to review the following:

  • Complete contact information;
  • Recruiter licensing and accreditation information;
  • Licensing and accreditation information for any sub-contractor or sub-agent used by the recruiter; and
  • Records of due diligence performed by the facility in screening and selecting labor recruiters.

4. All relevant facility policies and its operating procedures handbook.

A review of facility policies and procedures serves two basic functions:

  1. It can help you identify the formal policy framework that has been adopted by the facility to address key labor issues relating to migrant workers; and
  2. it can give you insight into the procedures developed by the facility to tackle human resource and other labor-related issues in the workplace.

Review these materials – including human resource policies and codes of conduct – to evaluate their commitment to:

  • Prohibit forced labor and human trafficking, and all forms of deception and coercion in the recruitment, hiring and management of migrant workers;
  • Fair treatment for migrant workers with respect to:
      • Remuneration;
      • Hours of work;
      • Overtime arrangements;
      • Leave entitlements;
      • Membership in trade unions;
      • Accommodation; and
      • Benefits and social insurance.
  • Contract only with those labor recruiters that commit to charge no fees or expenses to workers for recruitment.
  • Prohibit the confiscation or withholding of worker passports or other valuable documents.
      • However, in the event that this is required by law or requested by workers, review facility procedures to ensure that a clear and transparent mechanism has been established to guarantee that workers have access to their valuables at any time upon demand.
  • Prohibit:
      • The collection of deposits, security payments or bonds at the time of recruitment and at any other time during the employment relationship;
      • Compulsory and involuntary overtime beyond the limit established by national law; and
      • Disciplinary sanctions that impose forced or compulsory work as a punishment for workplace infractions.
  • Human resource practices in recruitment, contracts of employment, wages, and working hours that minimize the risk of forced labor and human trafficking.
  • Guarantee worker freedom of movement and personal freedom in the management and operation of employer-operated residences.
  • Progressively establish an effective screening and selection process for contracting responsible labor recruiters that includes rigorous assessment tools and methodologies.

5. Personnel files of a representative number of migrant workers.

In reviewing the personnel files of migrant workers, make sure to collect the following information in addition to what you have reviewed in the complete list of migrant and foreign contract workers in the facility:

  • A copy of the worker’s passport or national identification card;
  • Name and contact information of the relevant labor recruiter;
  • Emergency contact information;
  • Disciplinary notices, if applicable; and the
  • Signed employment contract.

Review the employment contracts of each migrant worker to ensure that wage provisions meet legal or industry minimum standards.

Contracts of employment should also:

  • Clearly state the circumstances in which workers can terminate their employment without penalty, given reasonable notice;
  • Specify the rights and responsibilities of workers with regard to:
      • Wages;
      • Hours of work;
      • Days off and annual leave; and
      • Disciplinary procedures that can result in termination.
  • Reveal no indications of contract substitution or the amendment of original contract provisions with those that are less favorable to the worker.

6. Personnel files of terminated migrant workers and those that have resigned.

Review the personnel files of terminated migrant workers and also those that have resigned.

Be sure to document all of the above, with a particular view towards grievance and disciplinary procedures:

  • Personnel files of dismissed employees should include an accurate and detailed reason for dismissal, and severance pay documentation, where legally required.
  • Make sure these files reveal no evidence of violence, intimidation, harassment or verbal or physical threats and abuse in the workplace.

7. Wage slips and salary statements of migrant workers (see also the box provided below).

  • Review the wage slips or salary statements of migrant workers to ensure that:
      • Salaries correspond to the legal or industry minimum, and are commensurate to those of country nationals working in the same job or section; and
      • Wage calculations are made clearly and with transparency. There should be no evidence of unlawful or unauthorized deductions.
  • Review records relating to wage advances or loans provided to migrant workers. Make sure that:
      • They comply with the law;
      • Interest rates for their repayment are not excessive;
      • Repayment terms are fair; and that
      • Such records indicate advanced written agreement to the terms and conditions of the loan and its repayment signed by both parties.
  • Where facilities are required or requested by workers to remit their earnings, or part thereof, to a third party, review the relevant records to ensure that:
      • They indicate this is done with workers’ prior knowledge and full and voluntary consent; and that
      • Workers receive a receipt for the full amount remitted.

8. Facility training and orientation records.

Documents from the labor recruiter

Note: Labor recruiters may not be onsite during your audit of a particular facility. To ensure that you receive the documents you need to conduct a full review, consider contacting the recruiter prior to your site visit.

Ask them to be ready to provide the following set of materials:

  1. A copy of the labor recruiters’ license(s) to operate in the country where workers are recruited and where they are placed with the facility.
  2. A copy of the signed contract between the labor recruiter and facility.
  3. A complete list of migrant and foreign contract workers provided to the facility.
    When you review this list, make sure it is consistent with that provided by the facility. It should include the following information: 

      • Full name and employee identification number for each worker;
      • Workstation department and work schedule and shift;
      • Date of hire;
      • Name of labor recruiter (both in the sending and receiving country);
      • Home country address and contact information; and
      • Emergency contact information
  4. A list of all sub-contractors or sub-agents used to provide workers to the facility.
    A given labor recruiter operating in the receiving country and placing workers at the facility may, in fact, operate through an extensive network of sub-contracted labor recruiters or sub-agents located in either the sending or receiving country. It is important to ensure that each of these operates in full compliance with the law and respects the rights of workers they help to place. Through your review of documents, make sure to collect the following:

              • A copy of each sub-contractor’s or sub-agent’s license to operate in each jurisdiction from which they recruit workers;
              • Copies of the contracts signed between the labor recruiter and its sub-contractors and sub-agents;
              • The names and contact information for each sub-contractor and sub-agent; and
              • A list of the workers recruited by each sub-contractor.
  5. Personnel files of a representative number of workers employed or managed by the labor recruiter. Like the review of these files conducted with the facility, you should make sure to collect the following information in addition to what you have collected in the complete list of migrant and foreign contract workers provided by the labor recruiter:
            • A copy of worker passports or national identification cards;
            • Emergency contact information;
            • Disciplinary notices, if applicable; and the
            • Signed employment contract.
  6. Personnel files of terminated workers and those that have resigned. Review the personnel files of terminated migrant workers and also those that have resigned. Be sure to document all of the above, with a particular view towards grievance and disciplinary procedures.
      • Personnel files of dismissed employees should include an accurate and detailed reason for dismissal, and severance pay documentation, where legally required.
      • Make sure these files reveal no evidence of violence, intimidation, harassment or verbal or physical threats and abuse in the workplace.
  7. All relevant labor recruiter policies and its operating procedures handbook.
    Like the review of facility policies and procedures, a similar review of labor recruiter operations serves two basic functions:

      1. to help the auditor identify the formal policy framework and standards that guide labor recruiter behavior with regard to the rights and protections of migrant workers; and
        • Labor recruiter records should indicate that the company has an implementing structure, an accountable officer and clear procedures to ensure that policies are compliant with all relevant legislation and regulation.
        • Labor recruiter policies should clearly prohibit all forms of forced labor, human trafficking, and deception and coercion in the recruitment, hiring and management of migrant workers. They should further ensure that migrant workers are treated no less favorably than country nationals with respect to:
            • Remuneration;
            • Hours of work;
            • Overtime arrangements;
            • Leave entitlements;
            • Membership in trade unions;
            • Accommodation; and
            • Benefits and social insurance.
        • Labor recruiter policies and procedures should also:
            • Clearly indicate that no fees or expenses are charged to workers for job placement services;
            • Prohibit the confiscation or withholding of workers’ passports or other valuable documentation, unless required by law or requested voluntarily by workers;
            • Prohibit compulsory or involuntary overtime beyond the limits established by law, or a maximum of 12 hours per week where the law is silent on the issue;
            • Ensure that no unreasonable restrictions are levied to limit migrant workers’ freedom of movement and personal freedom; and
            • Prohibit disciplinary sanctions that impose forced or compulsory work as a punishment for workplace infractions.
        • Human resource practices of the recruiter with respect to recruitment, employment contracts, wages and working hours should indicate measures adopted to minimize the risk of forced labor and trafficking in persons.
        • Written procedures should establish ethical practice in providing job-seekers with accurate details of working conditions at the time of recruitment, and that these details are communicated in language job-seekers understand. They should also prohibit recruiters or sub-contractors working on their behalf from making false promises concerning employment conditions, in particular regarding wage expectations.
        • Operating guidelines should further indicate that the labor recruiter has established an effective mechanism for confidential reporting of non-compliance, a grievance procedure, a process of investigating and reporting complaints, protection for whistleblowers, and an effective remediation procedure in the case of verified non-compliance.
  8. Wage slips and salary statements (see also the box provided below).
    • Review the wage slips or salary statements of migrant workers employed or managed by labor recruiters to ensure that:
    • Salaries correspond to the legal or industry minimum, and are commensurate to those of country nationals working in the same job or section; and
    • Wage calculations are made clearly, with transparency, and there is no evidence of unlawful or unauthorized deductions.
    • Review records relating to wage advances or loans provided to migrant workers, if applicable. Make sure that:
        • They comply with the law;
        • Interest rates for their repayment are fair;
        • Repayment terms are fair;
        • The repayment period does not exceed the term of the employment contract; and that
        • Such records indicate advanced written agreement to the terms and conditions of the loan and its repayment signed by both parties.
    • Where labor recruiters are required or requested by workers to remit their earnings, or a part thereof, to a third party, review relevant records to ensure that:
            • This is done with workers’ prior knowledge and full and voluntary consent; and
            • Workers receive a receipt for the full amount remitted.
  9. Labor recruiter training and orientation records.
    • These records should indicate that – prior to departure and upon arrival – workers received basic orientation and training on:
        • Their rights and responsibilities on the job as well as those of their employer, whether this is the labor recruiter or the facility;
        • Contractual obligations;
        • Terms and conditions of employment;
        • Living conditions; and
        • Grievance procedures that are in place for workers should they encounter a problem.

In focus: Auditing Wages
Analyzing pay documents can be the most complex, time-consuming aspect of an audit. However, this review, combined with worker interviews, is the only way to determine whether workers’ pay meets legal and contractual obligations.

A thorough analysis of pay systems should include:

    • A representative number of pay slips;
    • Payroll documents;
    • Time cards; and
    • Any other relevant material for wage calculation for each worker.

Once you have assembled these documents, attempt to determine if paid wages are legally and in agreement with the employment contracts signed by workers.

Some tips can help you in this task:

    • Be sure to differentiate base wage from gross or net when calculating;
    • Ensure that you apply the correct minimum wage rate according to region, type of factory and skill level of the worker;
    • Randomly select a representative sample size of migrant workers from the list provided by the brand or supplier facility and/or labor recruiter, and analyze their payroll records. The sample should represent all categories of migrant workers from all sections in the facility.

What to look for:

    • Verify from corresponding time cards and attendance records that all hours and days worked are recorded on the payroll.
    • Check the rate of overtime compensation and determine if it is legal.
    • Verify that workers were paid the legal overtime rate for overtime hours worked.
    • Check that only legally mandated deductions are made.
    • Check whether all workers have signed to indicate they have received their wages. If any worker has not signed, inquire why.
    • Check sample pay slips to check that all relevant information is provided.
    • Review the files of terminated or resigned workers and determine whether they were properly compensated.

2.5 Ensuring good practice in HR management

Strong human resources management helps prevent forced labor by ensuring fair treatment, transparent wages, and ethical oversight of migrant worker recruitment, housing, and documentation practices.

Explore this section

Introduction

Ensuring good practice in human resources management

As you have seen in previous sections of this Fair Hiring Toolkit, even before they arrive at the host facility, migrant workers are inherently vulnerable to conditions of forced labor, especially when recruitment and hiring have been outsourced to labor recruiters.

Companies should also be aware that some common management practices can actually increase the vulnerability of migrant workers to exploitation. It is important to understand what drives these practices, how they can be avoided without hampering the company’s need to achieve business objectives, and to develop appropriate management controls to mitigate the risks.

All key staff in the facility – including human resources personnel and line-managers – should be trained in positive, risk-mitigating management strategies. The tool to the right outlines some good management practices that facilities can implement.

It is also important to note that outsourcing on-site management functions – such as the handling grievance mechanisms, disciplinary procedures, and the provision of wages, benefits or housing – to labor recruiters can further exacerbate the vulnerability of migrant workers to exploitation. In fact, the inherent risks of this practice are so great that some brands prohibit their suppliers from outsourcing on-site human resource functions to labor recruiters.

If the outsourcing of human resource functions on-site is an unavoidable choice, then the supplier must put in place concrete measures to ensure that migrant workers are protected.

Tool 1: Sample strategies for managing risk and promoting good practice

Sample strategies for managing risk and promoting good practice in the on-site management of migrant workers

This Tool spells out some of the most common compliance violations that Verité sees in the on-site management of migrant workers. In some cases, these violations come about as a result of the outsourcing of management functions to labor recruiters. In other cases, the violations may stem from choices made by managers at the facility itself.

Either way, there are clear steps that can be taken to mitigate the risk of such compliance violations, and to promote good practice in the management of migrant workers in company facilities. This Tool matches those good practices and management controls with the compliance risks that they help to address.

Sample code of conduct provisions

Risks

  • Passports are withheld.
  • Workers are required to sign to additional terms, agreements, waivers.
  • Overcharging on documents processing fees.

Good practice to manage risks

  • There are procedures to record, track and document the post-arrival legal requirements for migrant workers.
  • There is a clear policy (communicated to labor recruiters) that prohibits the company or recruiters from holding original copies of workers’ passports.
  • There are means to verify recruiters’ compliance on recruitment fees and expenses paid by foreign contract workers:
      • Develop a non-reprisal policy;
      • Determine methodology (e.g., pre-departure verification, upon arrival);
      • Develop tools for verification (interview tools); and
      • Document all proceedings and supporting documents.
Post-arrival requirements and documents processing

Risks

  • Inconsistent messaging.
  • Training and communication may not be consistent with company policies and procedures.
  • Orientation and training are conducted by your Management Representative (not just by recruiters).

Good practice to manage risks

  • The orientation covers the following, at the minimum:
    • Company profile, policies & procedures;
    • Legal rights & other protections provided by the company’s & buyer’s codes of conduct;
    • Legal requirements;
    • Worker feedback & communication;
    • Discipline, termination and repatriation;
    • Dormitory regulations; and
    • Mechanisms for workers to report violations of company’s policies and ethical standards by company staff or recruiter.
  • There are clear procedures for workers’ on-the-job training.
  • There is objective evaluation of workers’ understanding of and training effectiveness.
  • There are standard, measurable, and objective indicators and tools for skills training evaluation.
  • All trainers speak the migrant workers’ native language.
Wages and benefits

Risks

  • Underpayment, delayed payments.
  • Recruiters could have access to workers’ bank accounts resulting in:
    • Forced savings; or
    • Illegal deductions.
  • Workers could be uninformed or misinformed about wage rates and deductions.
  • No pay slips provided.
  • Workers are ill-informed about the terms or the full amount of the loans or deductions.
  • Workers are induced or encouraged to make loans at usurious interest rates.
  • Automatic deductions for loan payments are made against workers’ salary.
  • The facility or the recruiter provides loans which has unreasonable terms of payments, leading workers to work longer hours to earn and pay off loans.

Good practice to manage risks

  • The company’s wages and benefits comply with legal requirements and are consistent with terms and conditions in employment the contract.
  • There are policies on:
    • Limited access to workers bank accounts;
    • Prohibition of deposits and forced savings; and
    • Bonuses, allowances, and deductions.
  • Workers are only paid directly, at regular intervals, on-time, and in accordance with national law.
  • Clear and transparent information are provided about hours worked, wage rates and legal deductions, if the latter are made.
  • Wage deductions are appropriate and stay within legal limits. They are calculated with transparency and with worker knowledge and consent.
  • If wage advances and loans are provided to workers, the terms are such that these can be repaid within a reasonable amount of time, and workers make out of pocket loan payments themselves, and receipts are always provided.
  • The company or the recruiter (1) provides smaller loans that amount to no more than one to three months’ base wages, (2) charges very low or no interest on the loan, and (3) establishes short installment/financing periods.
Deposits

Risks

  • Workers could be required to lodge deposits before taking up employment, and during employment.

Good practice to manage risks

  • There is a policy prohibiting deposits of any kind when workers take up employment, or at any time during their employment.
Document retention

Risks

  • Workers are required to surrender their passports and other key documents to the recruiter or employer.
  • Passports are taken without the workers’ full and informed consent.
  • Passports are taken from workers for safekeeping, and workers are made to sign a waiver indicating their consent.
  • Workers are required to post a bond, or pay a deposit in order to retrieve passports.
  • Workers are misinformed about their right to secure their own documents.
  • Workers are not provided means to secure their own documents.

Good practice to manage risks

  • There is a policy prohibiting the withholding of passports, or against requiring workers to surrender their passports to the company or to the recruiter for safekeeping and other purposes.
  • The company or the recruiter keeps the workers passports only upon the workers’ express consent.
  • Supplier conducts a post-arrival audit – to verify if workers’ passports are in the workers’ possession.
  • A management representative is present at the airport/terminal to meet new workers, to ensure that passports are not confiscated.
  • A periodic audit is conducted in the recruiters’ office premises, and in the workers’ dormitories to ensure that passports are not being withheld from workers, and that workers are provided means to secure their own travel and other personal documents
Dormitory and housing

Risks

  • Underpayment, delayed payments.
  • It is logistically difficult or impossible for workers to secure their housing accommodations themselves.
  • Recruiters or employers require workers to stay in recruiter-controlled or company-controlled housing facilities.
  • Curfews are implemented in the dormitories, and workers are unable to enter or leave the premises freely.
  • There are penalties for staying out, or for not returning to the dormitory or housing facility at a designated time. Gates are closed at designated times.
  • Security personnel are instructed to restrict workers from leaving or entering the dormitory or housing facility

Good practice to manage risks

  • There is a policy stating that workers are free to enter and leave their living quarters at all times.
  • The company does not require foreign workers to live in company-provided housing, unless required by law.
  • Workers are free to secure their own housing accommodations.
  • The company does not require or assign workers to live in dormitories or housing facilities that have unreasonable policies which curtail the workers’ freedom of movement.
  • Security personnel manning the dormitory gates are clearly instructed on their duties, their presence should not limit or impede the workers ability to enter or leave the premises.
  • Living quarters are kept safe, clean and hygienic, with adequate personal space and privacy.
  • Company-provided living quarters have working payphones available for the use of residents at any time. These phones ideally are placed in private locations, and workers are advised of several different easily accessible locations.
Worker feedback and communication

Risks

  • Workers have limited direct access to company.
  • The translators are not trained to handle workers’ grievances.
  • There is no immediate resolution and feedback.
  • Workers are afraid to report abuses by recruiters for fear of reprisals.

Good practice to manage risks

Humane treatment

Risks

  • No due process.
  • Punitive deductions are used as a disciplinary measure.
  • There are penalties for early contract termination.

Good practice to manage risks

  • Develop clearly defined and standard rules and regulations, and clearly communicate to all workers, supervisors, managers, and recruiters.
  • Ensure the following in your disciplinary measures:
    • Progressive disciplinary actions (for example: verbal warning; written warning; suspension; termination);
    • Clearly indicated step-by-step implementation procedures for discipline and termination (reasonable notice);
    • An impartial, objective appeal procedures;
    • No punitive fines and deductions;
    • No physically abusive or humiliating discipline and termination practices.
  • Provide workers who are under investigation with a translator who is selected or vetted by the worker.
  • Train all managers and supervisors in positive management techniques.
  • Develop a system for recording, tracking and documenting discipline and termination procedures.

2.6 Establishing effective grievance mechanisms

Effective grievance and whistleblower mechanisms enable migrant workers to raise concerns safely, promote ethical management, and help prevent forced labor and exploitation risks.

Explore this section

Introduction

Establishing effective grievance mechanisms & protection for whistleblowers

Robust and open communication between workers and management is essential for promoting trust and understanding in the workplace, enhancing performance, and generating the active participation of the workforce. Such communication is also essential to allow for problems and grievances to be raised, discussed, and resolved.

In the management systems model used by Verité, feedback mechanisms are a critical element in the continuous improvement cycle, and are considered an early warning system for the company to mitigate problems and implement necessary changes that provide long-term structural solutions to address procedural weaknesses even before they pose serious risks.

All company facilities should have a written grievance policy to receive and address workers’ grievances which takes into account migrant workers’ language translation needs. An effective grievance procedure should ensure that any migrant worker, acting individually or with other workers, can submit a grievance without suffering prejudice or retaliation of any kind.

The tools to the right can help you determine the necessary elements of a robust and effective grievance mechanism, and give you some examples of types of grievance mechanisms and their functions. Grievance mechanisms should be tailored to fit the environment, workforce demographics, and operations of individual company facilities.

Tool 1: An introduction to grievance mechanisms

An introduction to grievance mechanisms

All workers, and migrant workers in particular, should have access to grievance mechanisms that allow them to voice concerns without fear of punishment or retribution. The provision of these mechanisms by the employer is particularly crucial for migrant workers.

Grievance mechanisms have many helpful purposes. They can serve to channel conflict into an institutionalized mechanism for peaceful resolution. They facilitate communication between workers and management regarding problems that arise, and enable workers to complain with dignity, knowing that there is a system of appeals leading to an impartial decision maker.

Finally, they assist the company in ensuring that its staff is complying with company standards on ethical conduct.Company policy should include a description of the different processes and channels for workers to provide feedback on company practices and workplace issues – particularly those directly impacting workers’ employment concerns and welfare, and those relating to social responsibility standards. A robust grievance mechanism will allow employers to have a stronger, more stable workforce and will allow potential disruptive risks to be identified early. This can save employers time and money. It can also improve morale, and protect against reputational and legal risk.

What makes a grievance mechanism effective?
  • Established procedures are easy to understand;
  • A mechanism to ensure workers confidentiality;
  • A procedure for management to follow-up on reported grievances that is communicated to workers;
  • A procedure that allows workers to report a grievance against a supervisor to an impartial entity, and in any case to someone other than that supervisor or any other manager in that supervisor’s chain of command;
  • A procedure for workers to monitor the status of complaints;
  • Existence of an appeals system;
  • A policy that ensures that workers who report a grievance can do so without fear of penalty, dismissal or reprisal of any kind;
  • A policy that provides workers with grievances access to additional support or advocacy (i.e. interpreters, counseling).

Employers should set up grievance mechanisms that allow workers to take their problems, complaints and/or suggestions to management through different channels, depending on the issues being reported, who the worker has a complaint regarding, and how comfortable workers feel in reporting their grievances.

Possible examples of channels include:

  • a supervisor
  • a workers’ representative during worker assemblies
  • a union representative
  • workers’ committee
  • phone or text hotline (can be anonymous)
Special considerations for migrant workers

Employers should ensure that no worker is excluded from participation in grievance mechanisms. Social, cultural and language differences provide particular challenges in this regard.All communication regarding grievance mechanisms should be in languages that workers understand. Translators should be employed where necessary. Multiple communication channels should be provided to ensure that workers will find an avenue with which they are comfortable registering concerns.

Confidentiality – and anonymity – in submitting grievances should be assured to all workers. This provision should be emphasized to migrant workers during on-boarding and training.In cases where a labor recruiter manages migrant workers on-site, the recruiter should have grievance mechanisms in place; and the host facility should also provide migrant workers with confidential and anonymous channels to report recruiter misconduct.

Labor unions

A primary venue for worker-management communication and feedback is the labor union. Enhanced cooperation and communication between unions, workers and management facilitates mutual trust and respect, which in turn promote increased efficiency and productivity.

Below are some steps for establishing a system for worker, union and management communication and feedback:

  1. Establish clear and mutually agreed-upon terms of engagement for cooperation and communication with the union as a partner. Both parties should agree on the rules of engagement including roles, functions and areas of accountability for both parties. Parameters and conditions of union participation should be defined in the areas of:
    • Grievance procedures;
    • Discipline and termination; and
    • Communication.
  2. Develop a labor relations policy and an implementing structure to formalize communication with labor representatives within the facility. Labor relations policy should indicate procedures for:
    • Labor-management communication;
    • Worker feedback and participation in both a unionized and non-unionized workforce; and
    • Worker and union representation in health and safety committees, quality assurance teams, and other worker-represented councils.
Worker councils or committees

Worker committees are consultative bodies established to improve the welfare of workers and to foster the development of the business through participation and cooperation between workers and employers. They serve as a forum where management and employees may air their concerns, short of collective bargaining. These councils can help to resolve disputes and act as a mechanism for submitting a grievance.

A worker committee should ideally represent all worker nationalities/languages, so that each worker has a voice. Elections are held on a fixed schedule and elected leaders meet with human resource managers to discuss potential issues and promote constructive communication. A worker committee should operate by the following principles:

  • Front-line workers have the right to participate in decisions that affect their working lives;
  • Workers and management have a mutual interest in the success of factory operations;
  • Workers and management share a responsibility to work together to achieve that success.

Effective grievance mechanisms are a critical element of any well-functioning workplace. Where engagement with labor recruiters is concerned, such mechanisms can help you to gauge the performance of your recruiters. They can also serve as an early warning system for a host of labor and ethics violations that you will want to know about, including human trafficking and forced labor.

Tool 2: Evaluating the effectiveness of grievance mechanism

Evaluating the effectiveness of grievance mechanism

The design of grievance mechanisms is a tailored process that depends importantly on many factors, including the composition of the workforce, the size of the facility, the nature of the work and work schedules. Because of these and other complexities, Verité offers here not prescriptive guidance for designing grievance mechanisms, but rather a set of questions that can be used as a self-assessment to determine whether your existing grievance mechanisms are adequate and effective and whether or how to improve them.

A rationale and policy statement

The establishment of effective grievance mechanisms begins at the top, with policy statements that articulate the corporate value derived by the company from observing grievance procedures in the workplace.

Such statements should reference any relevant legal standards, as well as any client code of conduct requirements.

Companies can ask themselves the following questions in formulating policy statements on grievance mechanisms:

  • What is the company’s commitment statement regarding the establishment of grievance procedures?
  • Which of the company’s other ethical standards are relevant to grievance mechanisms?
  • Are there any relevant customer requirements?
  • What are the relevant legal standards?

The written policy should state a commitment to provide a venue for workers to be heard, for complaints to be acted upon and for management to provide feedback on the status of complaints. It should include assurance of non-reprisal and confidentiality, and an appeal system for unfavorably resolved complaints or disciplinary actions.

Designing effective grievance mechanisms

The following issues should be considered in the design of effective grievance mechanisms.

Regular communication
  • Does the company have clear communications channels that encourage workers to report violations or issues of concern?
  • Is there a venue in which management and workers can discuss issues of interest to workers, and elicit their feedback? Some venues that management may use to conduct meetings or discussions with migrant workers are:
      • Regular monthly meetings and worker assemblies;
      • Orientation sessions, upon commencement of employment;
      • Worker education trainings, to update and refresh worker awareness of company policies; and
      • Regular dormitory meetings, conducted by a human resources representative or the company’s labor recruiter coordinator.
Access
  • Can migrant workers directly access the company’s grievance channels?
  • Can migrant workers give feedback or report grievances to the company without having to go through the labor recruiter’s channels?
  • Do the grievance procedures of both the company and the labor recruiter allow migrant workers to seek assistance from their embassies?
Confidentiality
  • Do the grievance procedures provide a mechanism that ensures the confidentiality of worker submits the grievance? For example:
      • Is there a secure hotline that is handled by an objective party and can be used to report grievances privately and confidentially, including those relating to unethical management practices, without threat of reprisal?
      • Is there a suggestion box located in a secure location that workers are comfortable using? Are the suggestions evaluated and processed regularly by human resources? Is each suggestion addressed directly, responded to properly through a confidential verification/investigation process?
      • Are there other options that the company can explore to provide for confidential and private reporting, i.e., company intranet or email?
Protection for whistleblowers

Protection specifically for whistleblowers — persons who report or make disclosures about unethical or improper conduct by an employee or officer of a company — is an important element of any grievance mechanism system. The questions below will help you to evaluate whether your company has the requirements necessary to ensure whistleblower protection:

  • Is there a written company policy regarding the protection of whistleblowers?
  • Does the company provide workers with a way to confidentially report suspected ethical misconduct and that protects them from retaliation or other consequences?
  • Does the company have an established process for workers to anonymously report suspected violations of business conduct standards in order to prevent possible retaliation?
  • Does the company provide workers and external stakeholders with written information on how to report ethical or legal concerns?
  • Do workers understand how the grievance process works, and how whistleblowers are protected?
  • Is there a system of recording and documenting of employee reports of business ethics violations?

In focus: Some elements of effective grievance mechanism approaches

  • The company maintains a telephone hotline that allows employees to anonymously report ethical misconduct.
  • The company has a web-based system that allows employees to anonymously report ethical misconduct.
  • The company contracts an independent third party to manage the company’s grievance reporting.
  • The company has detailed procedures in place to protect whistleblower identity as part of the grievance investigation process.
Nonreprisal
  • Do the company’s grievance procedures clearly provide a mechanism that protects workers from reprisal?
Resolution and redress
  • Do the company’s grievance procedures provide a mechanism for immediate grievance resolution?
  • Is there a clear procedure for management follow-up of reported grievances? Is this procedure clearly communicated to workers?
  • Is the status of management’s response to reported grievances communicated back to the worker who submitted the grievance?
Capacity
  • Does the company orient and train its supervisors and managers on the handling of worker grievances?
  • Does the staff assigned to receive and handle workers’ grievances speak the languages of the workers?
  • Where translators are present, are there functions and availability to assist with grievances clearly communicated to all workers? Are the translators trained to handle grievances? Transparency and Documentation
  • Does the company communicate its grievance policy and procedures to all workers?
  • Are grievance proceedings, including any follow-up actions, properly documented and filed?

Evaluating the effectiveness of your grievance mechanisms against the above set of questions can be a good first step toward making necessary improvements to protect your company and your workforce from legal and ethical violations, and to make for a more well-functioning workplace.

2.7 Taking corrective action

Developing corrective action and systems improvement plans enables companies to remediate forced labor and trafficking risks, address root causes, and strengthen long-term ethical supply chain management.

Explore this section

Introduction

Many companies have the means and mechanisms to respond and react to non-conformance issues surfaced during social audits, but they may not be well-positioned to anticipate and avoid these problems in the first place, or to prevent them from happening again. Taking a reactive approach to problems can be more costly in the long run, and facility audits have shown that social responsibility problems tend to persist when remedial or corrective actions are either poorly maintained or are not implemented at all.

Developing a systems improvement plan that includes corrective and preventive measures helps a company to take both effective action against and proactively prevent practices that can lead to trafficking or forced labor for migrant workers.

A corrective action plan to address the trafficking or forced labor of a migrant worker must provide for the full protection of victim(s), and should include measures to support their rehabilitation, repatriation (if desired) or reintegration into the labor market and community. Public and non-governmental victim service providers with expertise in supporting migrant workers should be consulted as valuable resources to better understand the issue and address its root cause.

In general, a systems improvement plan must:

  • Detail the company’s specific responses to the issues (ensuring at all times that vulnerable workers are protected, that contingencies are in place to respond to issues where they happen)
  • Address the root causes of the issues, including the policies and practices that contributed to the problem
  • Map out the risks and their sources – the particular business processes, operational functions, or structural gaps from which the risks arise
  • Feed results into a management systems improvement plan.

The tools to the right offer more guidance on corrective action and systems improvement planning, where the trafficking or forced labor of migrant workers is concerned.

Tool 1: A guide to corrective action and systems improvement planning

A guide to corrective action and systems improvement planning

Forced labor and human trafficking are crimes under international human rights law and in most countries around the world. A case of this abuse discovered in the supply chain – among the worst forms of exploitation in the world of work – will demand immediate corrective action on the part of the facility, its sub-tier suppliers and any recruiters involved. Abuse of this kind will always be treated as a major breach of code compliance.

Corrective action will need to be comprehensive and systematic, involving both short and long term strategies. It should be focused on the needs and well-being of the trafficking victim(s) first and foremost, and involve key stakeholders such as victim service providers, health care professionals, and other public or civil society organizations, wherever necessary. This is a clear case where companies should strongly consider joint engagement in the best interests of the workers concerned.

Immediate action

If a case of forced labor or human trafficking is identified at the facility or in the supply chain (for example as a result of a social audit or another means of assessment), it is essential that the company respond immediately and unequivocally.

This should involve an immediate investigation including the participation of brand client representatives, a clear identification of the workers affected, and a full understanding of the nature of the abuse. Together with the brand, the supplier company will need to determine the extent and form of the problem before it can institute the full protective measures that will be required.

It will be necessary for the supplier company to act quickly to remediate the problems that have occurred and to reverse the cycle of abuse. Workers may need to be paid back wages; excessive recruitment fees may need to be reimbursed; and passports may need to be returned.

Whatever the nature of the abuse, the company will need to ensure that comprehensive corrective action is taken. To help with this process (and to ensure a full and timely response), it may be necessary to draw up a plan of action – a corrective action/performance improvement plan – that identifies priorities, responsibilities and timelines for each of the actors involved: the company, sub-tier suppliers, and recruiter(s).

At the center of the company’s response may be the need to consider repatriation for migrant workers. These workers – if they have suffered deception and abuse in the recruitment and hiring process – will have the right to return to their country of origin, if they desire. They may also require important assistance in reintegration into local labor markets and their communities of origin. A key element in ensuring the success of remediation efforts and a full transition for the migrant worker out of forced labor is the transition of that worker into free and fair employment.

Addressing root causes: From correcting problems to preventing them

To fully address an issue like forced labor, it isn’t enough to take immediate and short-term measures like these, as important as they are. It is also essential to consider longer-term actions to ensure that the problem(s) do not recur.

The supplier company will need to consider a few things. First, how is it that forced labor and human trafficking are present in the facility in the first place, and do they exist in other company facilities or elsewhere in the supply chain? Second, what needs to be done to ensure that these problems are solved and the company is no longer at risk?

To answer these questions, it will be necessary to look beyond the facility in question and the specific case of abuse. The company will need to take a thorough look at its systems and protocols, policies and assessment procedures, and other aspects of its social responsibility program to determine the root causes of what went wrong and where. As part of this, it may be advisable to conduct a thorough review and risk assessment across the supply base, including labor recruiters.

Whatever the nature of the abuse, a review of this kind will lead to stronger policies and procedures, and move the company away from piecemeal, reactive engagement towards proactive and preventive engagement. Responding in this way and developing new protections for migrant workers to promote fair hiring and recruitment, will promote a cycle of continuous improvement that will benefit both the company and its suppliers.

Further guidance on taking a step-by-step approach to corrective action is provided in the next tool: Developing a strategy for corrective action and systems improvement planning. Review it to learn more about analyzing the problem, identifying root causes and brainstorming possible improvements.

In Focus: From corrective action plans to systems improvement planning

In cases where a specific problem has occurred, it will be important for the company to develop a corrective action plan to ensure that remedial action is effective, timely and organized, and involves all the key players. In other cases, where no problems have been identified but where a potential for risk is present, a company may nevertheless wish to take a proactive approach and conduct preventive action planning. In this case, the company may wish to take the necessary steps to develop a strategy for taking preventive action before problems occur. This means the company will be prepared to meet a problem head on, should one occur in its supply chain.

Long term engagement: Tackling complex causes

Corrective action taken to address a specific incident of forced labor or human trafficking is likely to be immediate and time-bound. The company will seek to identify the problem and its root cause(s) and address it quickly, working with the facility and the recruiter in question.

For some “red flags” of forced labor, this is an appropriate strategy. The company can work through the problem directly, address the key issues, develop new policies and procedures, prohibit bad practice and thereby ensure greater protection for migrant workers. In other cases, however, problems are too complex for a “quick fix” approach and will demand a more nuanced and long-term strategy.

In these cases, the company may need to look beyond its own operations and those of its suppliers to address broader, industry-wide or even nation-wide concerns. This will involve tackling the fundamental causes of workplace or recruitment-based problems, and necessitate a multi-stakeholder or partnership approach, including with brands and customers.

A broader vision and strategy is needed to tackle the complex and diverse manifestations of forced labor and human trafficking in the supply chain effectively and sustainably. The solution to the fundamental causes of these problems lies beyond the reach of any single company or stakeholder.

Broader engagement on a national or industry-wide basis, with peer companies, brands, public policy actors and civil society can help companies and other business actors engage more effectively to root out these problems from their own facilities and supply chains, and from economies around the world.

Tool 2: Developing a strategy for corrective action and systems improvement planning

Developing a strategy for corrective action and systems improvement planning

This tool sets out the steps that companies can take to develop and implement plans to address identified cases of forced labor and human trafficking in their supply chains. These steps are contextualized in the example of “Company ABC”and its approach to remediating issues of passport retention, deposits and forced savings.

The material herein is drawn from Verité’s in-depth training on Problem Solving and Decision-Making for Social Responsibility.

Step 1: Review assessment findings

The first step to take is to review the findings of a supply chain audit, self-assessment or other form of assessment, taking the most recent one as the starting point, but also considering past assessments of the same supplier.

Examine both internal and third party assessments, and identify the key gaps or problems you need to address and where they occur in your operations or those of your recruiter(s), including recruitment, hiring and management of migrant workers. A review of assessment findings may reveal specific problems like passport retention that are likely to affect migrant workers only, or it may reveal bigger problems that affect the whole workforce at the facility.

Company ABC received a fairly good audit report from one of its brand clients, but was told that it immediately had to correct the following company practices:

    1. Passport retention
    2. Deposits and forced savings
Step 2: Analyze the problem

Companies should analyze the identified problems or gaps for root causes that may underlie them. Many non-conformance issues in the supply chain are manifestations or symptoms of larger problems. In addressing compliance violations, it is important to tackle not only the symptom but the root cause as well. Approaches that do not address root causes may prove inadequate, leaving underlying issues unaddressed and resulting in the recurrence of old problems and the creation of new ones.

There are many tools available to help you with systemic analysis, including:

  • Fishbone Diagram (or Cause and Effect Analysis);
  • Force Field Analysis;
  • KATTAR root cause analysis;
  • 5Ws/2Hs (Who, What, Where, When, Why & How Many, How Often);
  • Fault Tree Analysis; and
  • 5 Whys

Company ABC identified several causes for the passport retention issue. It also found that one of these causes – the fear of workers “running away” from the facility – was driven by the threat of government penalties to the facility in the event that migrant workers overstayed their visas. (The facility was the visa sponsor for the migrant workers.) This concern was also found to be the root of the practice of securing deposits and forced savings.

Step 3: Brainstorm possible changes and improvements to solve the problem

Once it is clear where a problem comes from, companies should act on the most immediate causes, working with any sub-tier suppliers and labor recruiters to do so. Many problems have more than one root cause and, in most cases, companies may need to address more than one issue to inspire real change.

When brainstorming these improvements, make sure there is a broad cross-section of people involved from different parts of the company and levels of the supply chain, with different perspectives and expertise.

Step 4: Decide on the best change and improvement option or decision analysis

Issues and decisions like these should be examined at policy, process and task levels to ensure that strategic thinking and decision-making is not only taking place at the operational level. This will ensure that suppliers are addressing problems in a systematic way and not just responding to issues as they occur.

Company ABC arrived at the following solutions:

  1. Cease the practice by suppliers and recruiters of withholding workers’ personal documents.
  2. Return workers’ passports, and provide workers with a lockable safety deposit box where they can keep their passports and other important documents. Put these boxes inside the factory.
  3. Cease the practice of deposits and forced savings.
  4. [To address the concern that migrant workers might “run away” if the facility no longer holds their passports] Improve worker retention by improving worker satisfaction:
    • Conduct worker satisfaction surveys
    • Benchmark practices of other companies for improving worker retention
    • Improve worker communication and feedback systems
        • Identify migrant workers’ concerns by ensuring that they have good access to worker communication and feedback mechanisms
        • Ensure that all grievances from migrant workers are responded to and resolved in a way that is mutually beneficial to management and workers
  5. Provide supervisory training on grievance handling, communication, and techniques for positive motivation.
Step 5: Develop a plan for implementing the decisions

Having identified an effective change and improvement option, companies should work to:

  1. Identify whether policies and procedures need to be developed or revised to support the change;
  2. Identify “change owners” at policy, procedural and task levels;
  3. Discuss a realistic timeframe for implementing the change;
  4. Identify performance indicators to measure effectiveness of the change; and
  5. Revise or design a complementary monitoring mechanism.
Step 6: Anticipate potential problems

After articulating the new plan, companies should consider identifying:

  1. Potential roadblocks to efficient and effective implementation.
  2. Preventive actions and contingent actions.
Step 7: Support implementation of the plan
Step 8: Determine milestones and monitoring schedule

Explore the next section

Next:

For governments

Go to next section